The effect of individual enabling and support on empowerment and depression severity in persons with affective disorders : outcome of a randomized control trial
(2018) In Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 72(4). p.259-267- Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of Individual Enabling and Support (IES) on empowerment and depression severity as compared to Traditional Vocational Rehabilitation (TVR) in people with affective disorders at 12 months follow-up. Additionally, longitudinal changes within the intervention groups and the correlation over time between empowerment and depression severity were evaluated. Method: A single-blind randomized controlled trial of two intervention groups, IES (n = 33) and TVR (n = 28), was performed with measurement points at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Individuals with affective disorders, including depression and bipolar disorder diagnoses were included. The Empowerment Scale and Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Self-Rating Scale... (More)
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of Individual Enabling and Support (IES) on empowerment and depression severity as compared to Traditional Vocational Rehabilitation (TVR) in people with affective disorders at 12 months follow-up. Additionally, longitudinal changes within the intervention groups and the correlation over time between empowerment and depression severity were evaluated. Method: A single-blind randomized controlled trial of two intervention groups, IES (n = 33) and TVR (n = 28), was performed with measurement points at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Individuals with affective disorders, including depression and bipolar disorder diagnoses were included. The Empowerment Scale and Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Self-Rating Scale were administered, and Intention-To-Treat analysis was applied. The study was registered with the trial number ISRCTN93470551. Result: There was a statistically significant difference between the intervention groups on empowerment and depression severity at 12 months. Within-group analysis showed that IES-participants increased their perceived empowerment and decreased their depression severity between measurement points, this was not seen among TVR-participants. A moderate, inverse relationship was detected between empowerment and depression. Conclusion: IES is more effective in increasing empowerment and decreasing depression severity after a 12-month intervention than is TVR. This study was limited by a small sample size and larger trials in different contexts are needed.
(Less)
- author
- Porter, Susann LU and Bejerholm, Ulrika LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2018-01-30
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- bipolar disorder, Depression, return-to-work, supported employment, vocational rehabilitation
- in
- Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
- volume
- 72
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 259 - 267
- publisher
- Informa Healthcare
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:29382250
- scopus:85041237502
- ISSN
- 0803-9488
- DOI
- 10.1080/08039488.2018.1432685
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 6ce3c7cb-0af3-458e-85cc-57d3c62605f6
- date added to LUP
- 2018-03-05 17:34:38
- date last changed
- 2024-10-14 22:42:54
@article{6ce3c7cb-0af3-458e-85cc-57d3c62605f6, abstract = {{<p>Purpose: To evaluate the effect of Individual Enabling and Support (IES) on empowerment and depression severity as compared to Traditional Vocational Rehabilitation (TVR) in people with affective disorders at 12 months follow-up. Additionally, longitudinal changes within the intervention groups and the correlation over time between empowerment and depression severity were evaluated. Method: A single-blind randomized controlled trial of two intervention groups, IES (n = 33) and TVR (n = 28), was performed with measurement points at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Individuals with affective disorders, including depression and bipolar disorder diagnoses were included. The Empowerment Scale and Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Self-Rating Scale were administered, and Intention-To-Treat analysis was applied. The study was registered with the trial number ISRCTN93470551. Result: There was a statistically significant difference between the intervention groups on empowerment and depression severity at 12 months. Within-group analysis showed that IES-participants increased their perceived empowerment and decreased their depression severity between measurement points, this was not seen among TVR-participants. A moderate, inverse relationship was detected between empowerment and depression. Conclusion: IES is more effective in increasing empowerment and decreasing depression severity after a 12-month intervention than is TVR. This study was limited by a small sample size and larger trials in different contexts are needed.</p>}}, author = {{Porter, Susann and Bejerholm, Ulrika}}, issn = {{0803-9488}}, keywords = {{bipolar disorder; Depression; return-to-work; supported employment; vocational rehabilitation}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{01}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{259--267}}, publisher = {{Informa Healthcare}}, series = {{Nordic Journal of Psychiatry}}, title = {{The effect of individual enabling and support on empowerment and depression severity in persons with affective disorders : outcome of a randomized control trial}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2018.1432685}}, doi = {{10.1080/08039488.2018.1432685}}, volume = {{72}}, year = {{2018}}, }