Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Patient-related outcome, fracture displacement and bone mineral density following distal radius fracture in young and older men

Egund, Lisa LU ; McGuigan, Fiona E. LU orcid ; Egund, Niels ; Besjakov, Jack LU and Åkesson, Kristina E. LU (2020) In BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 21(1).
Abstract

Background: Distal radius fractures can adversely affect wrist function; for men with this fracture, the role played by fracture severity, age and osteoporosis on fracture outcome has not been sufficiently studied. Objective: To describe patient-reported outcome and the association with bone integrity, fracture severity and future fracture risk among young and older men with distal radius fracture. Methods: This prospective study includes 133 men with acute distal radius fracture, mean age 54 (range 21–88), who were followed for 12 months. They were categorized as younger (< 65) and older (65+). Main outcome was DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) at 12 months; DASH > 15 was defined as poor outcome. Fractures were... (More)

Background: Distal radius fractures can adversely affect wrist function; for men with this fracture, the role played by fracture severity, age and osteoporosis on fracture outcome has not been sufficiently studied. Objective: To describe patient-reported outcome and the association with bone integrity, fracture severity and future fracture risk among young and older men with distal radius fracture. Methods: This prospective study includes 133 men with acute distal radius fracture, mean age 54 (range 21–88), who were followed for 12 months. They were categorized as younger (< 65) and older (65+). Main outcome was DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) at 12 months; DASH > 15 was defined as poor outcome. Fractures were classified and radiographic displacement identified at initial presentation and follow-up. BMD was measured and FRAX 10-year probability of fracture calculated. Results: Disability was higher in older men (DASHmedian 10 vs 2; p = 0.002); a clinically meaningful difference (ΔDASH = 10, p = 0.017) remained after adjustment for displacement, fracture classification and treatment method. Almost 50% of older men vs 14% in younger had poor outcome, p < 0.001. Bone mineral density did not independently predict outcome. Older men with a displaced fracture at initial presentation had greater disability (DASHmedian, IQR 45, 14;73) and risk of fracture (FRAXmajor osteoporotic 14, 8;21). Conclusion: Men over the age of 65 with a distal radius fracture are more likely to have post-fracture disability regardless of radiographic appearance. Fracture displacement, indicating impaired bone strength, is also more common and associated with an increased risk of fracture within 10-years. Secondary fracture prevention should therefore be considered in men presenting with distal radius fracture.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
BMD, patient-reported outcome, Displacement, Distal radius fracture, FRAX, Function, Men
in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
volume
21
issue
1
article number
816
publisher
BioMed Central (BMC)
external identifiers
  • scopus:85097283178
  • pmid:33287782
ISSN
1471-2474
DOI
10.1186/s12891-020-03843-9
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
70b5337a-764c-4a25-a23a-bb32b0c78048
date added to LUP
2020-12-15 07:24:11
date last changed
2024-05-30 01:44:37
@article{70b5337a-764c-4a25-a23a-bb32b0c78048,
  abstract     = {{<p>Background: Distal radius fractures can adversely affect wrist function; for men with this fracture, the role played by fracture severity, age and osteoporosis on fracture outcome has not been sufficiently studied. Objective: To describe patient-reported outcome and the association with bone integrity, fracture severity and future fracture risk among young and older men with distal radius fracture. Methods: This prospective study includes 133 men with acute distal radius fracture, mean age 54 (range 21–88), who were followed for 12 months. They were categorized as younger (&lt; 65) and older (65+). Main outcome was DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) at 12 months; DASH &gt; 15 was defined as poor outcome. Fractures were classified and radiographic displacement identified at initial presentation and follow-up. BMD was measured and FRAX 10-year probability of fracture calculated. Results: Disability was higher in older men (DASH<sub>median</sub> 10 vs 2; p = 0.002); a clinically meaningful difference (ΔDASH = 10, p = 0.017) remained after adjustment for displacement, fracture classification and treatment method. Almost 50% of older men vs 14% in younger had poor outcome, p &lt; 0.001. Bone mineral density did not independently predict outcome. Older men with a displaced fracture at initial presentation had greater disability (DASH<sub>median</sub>, IQR 45, 14;73) and risk of fracture (FRAX<sub>major osteoporotic</sub> 14, 8;21). Conclusion: Men over the age of 65 with a distal radius fracture are more likely to have post-fracture disability regardless of radiographic appearance. Fracture displacement, indicating impaired bone strength, is also more common and associated with an increased risk of fracture within 10-years. Secondary fracture prevention should therefore be considered in men presenting with distal radius fracture.</p>}},
  author       = {{Egund, Lisa and McGuigan, Fiona E. and Egund, Niels and Besjakov, Jack and Åkesson, Kristina E.}},
  issn         = {{1471-2474}},
  keywords     = {{BMD, patient-reported outcome; Displacement; Distal radius fracture; FRAX; Function; Men}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{BioMed Central (BMC)}},
  series       = {{BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders}},
  title        = {{Patient-related outcome, fracture displacement and bone mineral density following distal radius fracture in young and older men}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03843-9}},
  doi          = {{10.1186/s12891-020-03843-9}},
  volume       = {{21}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}