Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Narrating decarbonisation: Stories of climate action in the petrochemical industry

Tilsted, Joachim Peter LU orcid ; Mah, Alice ; Nielsen, Tobias LU ; Finkill, Guy David LU and Bauer, Fredric LU orcid (2022) International Conference on Fossil Fuel Supply and Climate Policy
Abstract
Despite its role in ensuring the ubiquity of fossil fuels in modern society, the petrochemical sector has long flown under the public radar in energy and climate debates. However, faced with increasing pressures from its involvement in driving multiple and intersecting ecological crises, firms in the petrochemical industry are seeking to make sustainability a core part of their public image. Although recent climate commitments might signal a start towards a low-carbon transition, there is a risk that industry leaders follow the pattern that has consistently been the case throughout their history and only pay lip service to current trends to ease legislative pressure, secure financing and continue business as usual, legitimizing the strong... (More)
Despite its role in ensuring the ubiquity of fossil fuels in modern society, the petrochemical sector has long flown under the public radar in energy and climate debates. However, faced with increasing pressures from its involvement in driving multiple and intersecting ecological crises, firms in the petrochemical industry are seeking to make sustainability a core part of their public image. Although recent climate commitments might signal a start towards a low-carbon transition, there is a risk that industry leaders follow the pattern that has consistently been the case throughout their history and only pay lip service to current trends to ease legislative pressure, secure financing and continue business as usual, legitimizing the strong carbon lock-in within the sector. Therefore, this paper aims to identify and explore commonly invoked industry narratives of climate action. To do so, we focus on climate communication from the largest petrochemical companies, most of which also are fossil fuel extractors, mapping their discursive strategy. We argue that the set of strategic narratives that we identify portray the petrochemical industry as of unquestionable societal importance, promoting the idea that stringent regulation is not needed, and that criticism leveraged against the industry are based on misunderstandings. This discourse strategy works to reduce pressure for deep mitigation cuts while repositioning the industry as part of the solution. Relating this to the broader literature on the use of discursive power and corporate framing of climate change, we compare the discursive strategy around petrochemical production to that of fossil fuel extraction. Despite relying on fossil feedstock and being solidly placed in the fossil-based energy order with strong historical, knowledge-based, and economic linkages to oil, gas, and coal, discursive strategies in key aspects. In making this argument, we show how downstream actors work to legitimize continued exploration and production of fossil fuels. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to conference
publication status
published
subject
conference name
International Conference on Fossil Fuel Supply and Climate Policy
conference location
Oxford, United Kingdom
conference dates
2022-09-27 - 2022-09-27
project
Petrochemicals and Climate Change: Mapping Power Structures
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
71999ba7-1d29-4f58-b857-52f027d500a6
date added to LUP
2022-11-29 09:58:24
date last changed
2022-11-30 15:15:51
@misc{71999ba7-1d29-4f58-b857-52f027d500a6,
  abstract     = {{Despite its role in ensuring the ubiquity of fossil fuels in modern society, the petrochemical sector has long flown under the public radar in energy and climate debates. However, faced with increasing pressures from its involvement in driving multiple and intersecting ecological crises, firms in the petrochemical industry are seeking to make sustainability a core part of their public image. Although recent climate commitments might signal a start towards a low-carbon transition, there is a risk that industry leaders follow the pattern that has consistently been the case throughout their history and only pay lip service to current trends to ease legislative pressure, secure financing and continue business as usual, legitimizing the strong carbon lock-in within the sector. Therefore, this paper aims to identify and explore commonly invoked industry narratives of climate action. To do so, we focus on climate communication from the largest petrochemical companies, most of which also are fossil fuel extractors, mapping their discursive strategy. We argue that the set of strategic narratives that we identify portray the petrochemical industry as of unquestionable societal importance, promoting the idea that stringent regulation is not needed, and that criticism leveraged against the industry are based on misunderstandings. This discourse strategy works to reduce pressure for deep mitigation cuts while repositioning the industry as part of the solution. Relating this to the broader literature on the use of discursive power and corporate framing of climate change, we compare the discursive strategy around petrochemical production to that of fossil fuel extraction. Despite relying on fossil feedstock and being solidly placed in the fossil-based energy order with strong historical, knowledge-based, and economic linkages to oil, gas, and coal, discursive strategies in key aspects. In making this argument, we show how downstream actors work to legitimize continued exploration and production of fossil fuels.}},
  author       = {{Tilsted, Joachim Peter and Mah, Alice and Nielsen, Tobias and Finkill, Guy David and Bauer, Fredric}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  title        = {{Narrating decarbonisation: Stories of climate action in the petrochemical industry}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}