Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Go out or stress out? : Exploring nature connectedness and cumulative stress as resilience and vulnerability factors in different manifestations of climate anxiety

Wullenkord, Marlis LU orcid ; Johansson, Maria LU orcid ; Loy, Laura S ; Menzel, Claudia and Reese, Gerhard (2023)
Abstract
Given the increasing severity of the climate crisis and, with it, rising climate anxiety, it is imperative to understand what climate anxiety is, how it functions, and how people can cope with it constructively. Nevertheless, research has often mixed different conceptualizations and operationalizations of climate anxiety, yielding sometimes seemingly contradictory findings. This study contributes with a more nuanced and structured approach by 1) exploring systematically how climate anxiety manifests (i.e., investigating the existence of subgroups), and 2) investigating vulnerability and resilience factors that might explain belonging to these different subgroups. We analyzed answers of N=2052 German-speaking survey respondents, stratified... (More)
Given the increasing severity of the climate crisis and, with it, rising climate anxiety, it is imperative to understand what climate anxiety is, how it functions, and how people can cope with it constructively. Nevertheless, research has often mixed different conceptualizations and operationalizations of climate anxiety, yielding sometimes seemingly contradictory findings. This study contributes with a more nuanced and structured approach by 1) exploring systematically how climate anxiety manifests (i.e., investigating the existence of subgroups), and 2) investigating vulnerability and resilience factors that might explain belonging to these different subgroups. We analyzed answers of N=2052 German-speaking survey respondents, stratified for age, gender, and education, who provided information on different facets of their climate anxiety (namely climate-anxious appraisal, affect, and potentially related impairment). Using latent profile analysis, we identified four subgroups with different manifestations of climate anxiety: climate-anxious impaired (8.5%), climate-anxious less impaired (17.5%), climate-anxious functioning (41%), and non-climate anxious (33%). Subsequent multinomial logistic regression revealed that high nature connectedness, male gender, and young age but not cumulative stress (i.e., combination of stressors such as unemployment and low presence of high-quality nature in one’s living environment) were potential vulnerability factors to belong to the climate-anxious impaired group compared to all other groups. Our person-centered approach nuances the study of climate anxiety and advances possibilities to study constructive coping with climate anxiety. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Working paper/Preprint
publication status
published
subject
keywords
climate anxiety, eco-anxiety, nature connectedness, resilience, cumulative stress, latent profile analysis
pages
39 pages
publisher
PsyArXiv
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/jvq89
project
Nature-based solutions at the climate-biodiversity-health nexus
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
824b8cc0-24ff-4c13-a8bc-4215f7d2b088
date added to LUP
2023-10-20 11:43:54
date last changed
2023-10-25 03:13:48
@misc{824b8cc0-24ff-4c13-a8bc-4215f7d2b088,
  abstract     = {{Given the increasing severity of the climate crisis and, with it, rising climate anxiety, it is imperative to understand what climate anxiety is, how it functions, and how people can cope with it constructively. Nevertheless, research has often mixed different conceptualizations and operationalizations of climate anxiety, yielding sometimes seemingly contradictory findings. This study contributes with a more nuanced and structured approach by 1) exploring systematically how climate anxiety manifests (i.e., investigating the existence of subgroups), and 2) investigating vulnerability and resilience factors that might explain belonging to these different subgroups. We analyzed answers of N=2052 German-speaking survey respondents, stratified for age, gender, and education, who provided information on different facets of their climate anxiety (namely climate-anxious appraisal, affect, and potentially related impairment). Using latent profile analysis, we identified four subgroups with different manifestations of climate anxiety: climate-anxious impaired (8.5%), climate-anxious less impaired (17.5%), climate-anxious functioning (41%), and non-climate anxious (33%). Subsequent multinomial logistic regression revealed that high nature connectedness, male gender, and young age but not cumulative stress (i.e., combination of stressors such as unemployment and low presence of high-quality nature in one’s living environment) were potential vulnerability factors to belong to the climate-anxious impaired group compared to all other groups. Our person-centered approach nuances the study of climate anxiety and advances possibilities to study constructive coping with climate anxiety.}},
  author       = {{Wullenkord, Marlis and Johansson, Maria and Loy, Laura S and Menzel, Claudia and Reese, Gerhard}},
  keywords     = {{climate anxiety; eco-anxiety; nature connectedness; resilience; cumulative stress; latent profile analysis}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{10}},
  note         = {{Preprint}},
  publisher    = {{PsyArXiv}},
  title        = {{Go out or stress out? : Exploring nature connectedness and cumulative stress as resilience and vulnerability factors in different manifestations of climate anxiety}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jvq89}},
  doi          = {{10.31234/osf.io/jvq89}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}