Advanced

Making Direct Democracy Work : An economic perspective on the graphe paranomon in ancient Athens

Lyttkens, Carl Hampus LU ; Tridimas, George and Lindgren, Anna LU (2017) In Working Papers 2017(10).
Abstract
The specific way the Athenians set up their democracy presents both theoretical and empirical challenges. Decisions were taken by majority vote in the Assembly. To keep politicians in line, the Athenians first used ostracism, which however was replaced by the graphe paranomon around 415 BCE. The latter provided that anybody who had made a proposal in the Assembly could be accused of having made an unconstitu¬tional suggestion, bringing a severe penalty if found guilty. We know of 35 such cases between 403 and 322. During the fourth century the notion of illegality was extended to a mere question of undesirability. Henceforth any decision by the Assembly could be overturned by the courts, but if the accuser failed to get at least 20% of the... (More)
The specific way the Athenians set up their democracy presents both theoretical and empirical challenges. Decisions were taken by majority vote in the Assembly. To keep politicians in line, the Athenians first used ostracism, which however was replaced by the graphe paranomon around 415 BCE. The latter provided that anybody who had made a proposal in the Assembly could be accused of having made an unconstitu¬tional suggestion, bringing a severe penalty if found guilty. We know of 35 such cases between 403 and 322. During the fourth century the notion of illegality was extended to a mere question of undesirability. Henceforth any decision by the Assembly could be overturned by the courts, but if the accuser failed to get at least 20% of the jury votes, he was punished instead. While these rules can be seen as a safeguard against bad decisions, they also provided the Athenian politicians with important information about the relative strength of their political support. This effect has not been analysed before, and it may help explain the relative stability of political life in classical Athens. Furthermore this analysis also contributes to our understanding of a curious but often overlooked fact, namely that the decrees of the Athenian Assembly to a great extent concerned honorary rewards, and the use of the graphe paranomon in turn was largely focussed on the honorary decrees. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Working Paper
publication status
published
subject
keywords
ancient Athens, graphe paranomon, direct democracy, judicial review, voter, information, political stability, jury composition, N4, N43, H1
in
Working Papers
volume
2017
issue
10
pages
28 pages
publisher
Department of Economics, Lund Universtiy
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
876f2501-5252-435c-b593-c5e5123f7e04
date added to LUP
2017-07-14 15:24:01
date last changed
2017-07-14 15:24:01
@misc{876f2501-5252-435c-b593-c5e5123f7e04,
  abstract     = {The specific way the Athenians set up their democracy presents both theoretical and empirical challenges. Decisions were taken by majority vote in the Assembly. To keep politicians in line, the Athenians first used ostracism, which however was replaced by the graphe paranomon around 415 BCE. The latter provided that anybody who had made a proposal in the Assembly could be accused of having made an unconstitu¬tional suggestion, bringing a severe penalty if found guilty. We know of 35 such cases between 403 and 322. During the fourth century the notion of illegality was extended to a mere question of undesirability. Henceforth any decision by the Assembly could be overturned by the courts, but if the accuser failed to get at least 20% of the jury votes, he was punished instead. While these rules can be seen as a safeguard against bad decisions, they also provided the Athenian politicians with important information about the relative strength of their political support. This effect has not been analysed before, and it may help explain the relative stability of political life in classical Athens. Furthermore this analysis also contributes to our understanding of a curious but often overlooked fact, namely that the decrees of the Athenian Assembly to a great extent concerned honorary rewards, and the use of the graphe paranomon in turn was largely focussed on the honorary decrees.},
  author       = {Lyttkens, Carl Hampus and Tridimas, George and Lindgren, Anna},
  keyword      = {ancient Athens,graphe paranomon,direct democracy,judicial review,voter,information,political stability,jury composition,N4,N43,H1},
  language     = {eng},
  note         = {Working Paper},
  number       = {10},
  pages        = {28},
  publisher    = {Department of Economics, Lund Universtiy},
  series       = {Working Papers},
  title        = {Making Direct Democracy Work : An economic perspective on the graphe paranomon in ancient Athens},
  volume       = {2017},
  year         = {2017},
}