Sudan’s internal hesitance over the GERD : policy, polarization, and national strategy
(2026) In Water International- Abstract
The GERD has been a focal point of hydropolitical tensions in the Nile River Basin, primarily involving Ethiopia, Sudan, and Egypt. This article examines Sudan’s unique position and role as a potential mediator in this tripartite dispute. Khartoum’s mediation role, driven by its own vested interests in the dam’s operation, including benefits from regulated flood control, electricity generation and water security, could be essential in reducing regional tensions. However, due to a historical shaky position on the GERD and an unstable domestic policy, Sudan has yet to fully express its potential as a diplomatic facilitator in the regional water dispute.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/8c6b1b2e-2a55-4875-9f3a-08518a4cab23
- author
- Verre, Filippo
LU
; Berndtsson, Ronny
LU
and Hashemi, Hossein
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2026-02-18
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- epub
- subject
- keywords
- dam management, GERD, Sudan, sustainable development, trans-regional cooperation, water diplomacy, Water tensions
- in
- Water International
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:105030547622
- ISSN
- 0250-8060
- DOI
- 10.1080/02508060.2026.2628483
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- Publisher Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
- id
- 8c6b1b2e-2a55-4875-9f3a-08518a4cab23
- date added to LUP
- 2026-03-02 15:52:41
- date last changed
- 2026-03-04 03:00:48
@article{8c6b1b2e-2a55-4875-9f3a-08518a4cab23,
abstract = {{<p>The GERD has been a focal point of hydropolitical tensions in the Nile River Basin, primarily involving Ethiopia, Sudan, and Egypt. This article examines Sudan’s unique position and role as a potential mediator in this tripartite dispute. Khartoum’s mediation role, driven by its own vested interests in the dam’s operation, including benefits from regulated flood control, electricity generation and water security, could be essential in reducing regional tensions. However, due to a historical shaky position on the GERD and an unstable domestic policy, Sudan has yet to fully express its potential as a diplomatic facilitator in the regional water dispute.</p>}},
author = {{Verre, Filippo and Berndtsson, Ronny and Hashemi, Hossein}},
issn = {{0250-8060}},
keywords = {{dam management; GERD; Sudan; sustainable development; trans-regional cooperation; water diplomacy; Water tensions}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{02}},
publisher = {{Taylor & Francis}},
series = {{Water International}},
title = {{Sudan’s internal hesitance over the GERD : policy, polarization, and national strategy}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2026.2628483}},
doi = {{10.1080/02508060.2026.2628483}},
year = {{2026}},
}