Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Prediction of poor neurological outcome in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest : a systematic review

Sandroni, Claudio ; D’Arrigo, Sonia ; Cacciola, Sofia ; Hoedemaekers, Cornelia W.E. ; Kamps, Marlijn J.A. ; Oddo, Mauro ; Taccone, Fabio S. ; Di Rocco, Arianna ; Meijer, Frederick J.A. and Westhall, Erik LU , et al. (2020) In Intensive Care Medicine 46(10). p.1803-1851
Abstract

Purpose: To assess the ability of clinical examination, blood biomarkers, electrophysiology, or neuroimaging assessed within 7 days from return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) to predict poor neurological outcome, defined as death, vegetative state, or severe disability (CPC 3–5) at hospital discharge/1 month or later, in comatose adult survivors from cardiac arrest (CA). Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (January 2013–April 2020) were searched. Sensitivity and false-positive rate (FPR) for each predictor were calculated. Due to heterogeneities in recording times, predictor thresholds, and definition of some predictors, meta-analysis was not performed. Results: Ninety-four studies... (More)

Purpose: To assess the ability of clinical examination, blood biomarkers, electrophysiology, or neuroimaging assessed within 7 days from return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) to predict poor neurological outcome, defined as death, vegetative state, or severe disability (CPC 3–5) at hospital discharge/1 month or later, in comatose adult survivors from cardiac arrest (CA). Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (January 2013–April 2020) were searched. Sensitivity and false-positive rate (FPR) for each predictor were calculated. Due to heterogeneities in recording times, predictor thresholds, and definition of some predictors, meta-analysis was not performed. Results: Ninety-four studies (30,200 patients) were included. Bilaterally absent pupillary or corneal reflexes after day 4 from ROSC, high blood values of neuron-specific enolase from 24 h after ROSC, absent N20 waves of short-latency somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) or unequivocal seizures on electroencephalogram (EEG) from the day of ROSC, EEG background suppression or burst-suppression from 24 h after ROSC, diffuse cerebral oedema on brain CT from 2 h after ROSC, or reduced diffusion on brain MRI at 2–5 days after ROSC had 0% FPR for poor outcome in most studies. Risk of bias assessed using the QUIPS tool was high for all predictors. Conclusion: In comatose resuscitated patients, clinical, biochemical, neurophysiological, and radiological tests have a potential to predict poor neurological outcome with no false-positive predictions within the first week after CA. Guidelines should consider the methodological concerns and limited sensitivity for individual modalities. (PROSPERO CRD42019141169).

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
@article{9337cdb7-b0ea-48d1-a38e-34aae5ee012a,
  abstract     = {{<p>Purpose: To assess the ability of clinical examination, blood biomarkers, electrophysiology, or neuroimaging assessed within 7 days from return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) to predict poor neurological outcome, defined as death, vegetative state, or severe disability (CPC 3–5) at hospital discharge/1 month or later, in comatose adult survivors from cardiac arrest (CA). Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (January 2013–April 2020) were searched. Sensitivity and false-positive rate (FPR) for each predictor were calculated. Due to heterogeneities in recording times, predictor thresholds, and definition of some predictors, meta-analysis was not performed. Results: Ninety-four studies (30,200 patients) were included. Bilaterally absent pupillary or corneal reflexes after day 4 from ROSC, high blood values of neuron-specific enolase from 24 h after ROSC, absent N20 waves of short-latency somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) or unequivocal seizures on electroencephalogram (EEG) from the day of ROSC, EEG background suppression or burst-suppression from 24 h after ROSC, diffuse cerebral oedema on brain CT from 2 h after ROSC, or reduced diffusion on brain MRI at 2–5 days after ROSC had 0% FPR for poor outcome in most studies. Risk of bias assessed using the QUIPS tool was high for all predictors. Conclusion: In comatose resuscitated patients, clinical, biochemical, neurophysiological, and radiological tests have a potential to predict poor neurological outcome with no false-positive predictions within the first week after CA. Guidelines should consider the methodological concerns and limited sensitivity for individual modalities. (PROSPERO CRD42019141169).</p>}},
  author       = {{Sandroni, Claudio and D’Arrigo, Sonia and Cacciola, Sofia and Hoedemaekers, Cornelia W.E. and Kamps, Marlijn J.A. and Oddo, Mauro and Taccone, Fabio S. and Di Rocco, Arianna and Meijer, Frederick J.A. and Westhall, Erik and Antonelli, Massimo and Soar, Jasmeet and Nolan, Jerry P. and Cronberg, Tobias}},
  issn         = {{0342-4642}},
  keywords     = {{Cardiac arrest; Clinical examination; Coma; Computed tomography; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Neuron-specific enolase; Prognosis; Somatosensory-evoked potentials}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{10}},
  pages        = {{1803--1851}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  series       = {{Intensive Care Medicine}},
  title        = {{Prediction of poor neurological outcome in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest : a systematic review}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06198-w}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s00134-020-06198-w}},
  volume       = {{46}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}