Studying risk governance using a design perspective
(2014) In Safety Science 68. p.89-98- Abstract
- A conceptual framework for systematically studying and analysing risk governance is introduced. The framework, which is influenced by design science, is particularly valuable for relating the way risks are handled at the micro-level to aspects at the macro-level. Three central concepts are included in the framework: purpose, function, and form. A function is used to denote what a specific system does, or needs to do, to achieve the purpose of a risk governance process. The purpose of a risk governance process answers the question why it exists, or why it should be introduced, while the form denotes how the functions are, or should be, carried out in practice. The framework is especially useful as a basis for identifying problems related to... (More)
- A conceptual framework for systematically studying and analysing risk governance is introduced. The framework, which is influenced by design science, is particularly valuable for relating the way risks are handled at the micro-level to aspects at the macro-level. Three central concepts are included in the framework: purpose, function, and form. A function is used to denote what a specific system does, or needs to do, to achieve the purpose of a risk governance process. The purpose of a risk governance process answers the question why it exists, or why it should be introduced, while the form denotes how the functions are, or should be, carried out in practice. The framework is especially useful as a basis for identifying problems related to a fragmentation of the risk governance process in contexts involving multiple stakeholders. Moreover, it allows descriptive, evaluative, as well as normative approaches. In this way, the framework manages to connect two central types of problems. On the one hand it addresses the problem of understanding and explaining a risk governance process (descriptive approach) and, on the other hand, the problem of constructing, or improving it (normative approach). The usefulness of the design perspective is exemplified in two cases, and the findings from both of these cases indicate a fragmentation of the risk governance process. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/4390222
- author
- Cedergren, Alexander LU and Tehler, Henrik LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2014
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- design perspective, design science, risk governance, risk management, fragmentation
- in
- Safety Science
- volume
- 68
- pages
- 89 - 98
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000338402100012
- scopus:84897492819
- ISSN
- 0925-7535
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.03.006
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 99ac1e57-c20b-4eb8-af7f-74c12d82ee2b (old id 4390222)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 14:35:37
- date last changed
- 2022-02-19 19:51:57
@article{99ac1e57-c20b-4eb8-af7f-74c12d82ee2b,
abstract = {{A conceptual framework for systematically studying and analysing risk governance is introduced. The framework, which is influenced by design science, is particularly valuable for relating the way risks are handled at the micro-level to aspects at the macro-level. Three central concepts are included in the framework: purpose, function, and form. A function is used to denote what a specific system does, or needs to do, to achieve the purpose of a risk governance process. The purpose of a risk governance process answers the question why it exists, or why it should be introduced, while the form denotes how the functions are, or should be, carried out in practice. The framework is especially useful as a basis for identifying problems related to a fragmentation of the risk governance process in contexts involving multiple stakeholders. Moreover, it allows descriptive, evaluative, as well as normative approaches. In this way, the framework manages to connect two central types of problems. On the one hand it addresses the problem of understanding and explaining a risk governance process (descriptive approach) and, on the other hand, the problem of constructing, or improving it (normative approach). The usefulness of the design perspective is exemplified in two cases, and the findings from both of these cases indicate a fragmentation of the risk governance process.}},
author = {{Cedergren, Alexander and Tehler, Henrik}},
issn = {{0925-7535}},
keywords = {{design perspective; design science; risk governance; risk management; fragmentation}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{89--98}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Safety Science}},
title = {{Studying risk governance using a design perspective}},
url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/4058869/4391647.pdf}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.ssci.2014.03.006}},
volume = {{68}},
year = {{2014}},
}