Danish translation and psychometric testing of the Rivermead Mobility Index.
(2013) In Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 128(4). p.20-25- Abstract
- OBJECTIVES: The Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) is widely used in several neurological conditions including multiple sclerosis (MS), but its psychometric properties have not been documented in Scandinavia. Therefore, the aim of the study was to translate RMI from UK English into Danish and conduct an initial psychometric testing of the Danish RMI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Danish translation conducted by the forward-backward method was first field-tested regarding user-friendliness and relevance. It was then psychometrically tested among 40 outpatients with MS regarding unidimensionality (corrected item-total correlations, adherence to an assumed Guttman response pattern), reliability, and construct validity. RESULTS: Field testing found... (More)
- OBJECTIVES: The Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) is widely used in several neurological conditions including multiple sclerosis (MS), but its psychometric properties have not been documented in Scandinavia. Therefore, the aim of the study was to translate RMI from UK English into Danish and conduct an initial psychometric testing of the Danish RMI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Danish translation conducted by the forward-backward method was first field-tested regarding user-friendliness and relevance. It was then psychometrically tested among 40 outpatients with MS regarding unidimensionality (corrected item-total correlations, adherence to an assumed Guttman response pattern), reliability, and construct validity. RESULTS: Field testing found the Danish RMI relevant and user-friendly. Corrected item-total correlations were ≥0.47 and item responses fitted the Guttman pattern. There was a 47.5% ceiling effect, and reliability was 0.91. Correlations supported construct validity. CONCLUSION: The Danish RMI is user-friendly, unidimensional, reliable, and valid. The results correspond to those previously reported with the original UK RMI version. Ceiling effects are limiting but sample related. Larger samples representing a wider variety of MS severities are needed for firmer evaluation of the Danish RMI. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/3913465
- author
- Steen Krawcyk, R ; Hagell, Peter LU and Sjödahl Hammarlund, Catharina LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2013
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
- volume
- 128
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 20 - 25
- publisher
- Wiley-Blackwell
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000324091700001
- pmid:23758575
- scopus:84883827268
- pmid:23758575
- ISSN
- 1600-0404
- DOI
- 10.1111/ane.12144
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 9b1ef7ad-68fc-4242-b2bd-49655db7d7ce (old id 3913465)
- alternative location
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23758575?dopt=Abstract
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 10:07:41
- date last changed
- 2022-03-04 08:23:22
@misc{9b1ef7ad-68fc-4242-b2bd-49655db7d7ce, abstract = {{OBJECTIVES: The Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) is widely used in several neurological conditions including multiple sclerosis (MS), but its psychometric properties have not been documented in Scandinavia. Therefore, the aim of the study was to translate RMI from UK English into Danish and conduct an initial psychometric testing of the Danish RMI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Danish translation conducted by the forward-backward method was first field-tested regarding user-friendliness and relevance. It was then psychometrically tested among 40 outpatients with MS regarding unidimensionality (corrected item-total correlations, adherence to an assumed Guttman response pattern), reliability, and construct validity. RESULTS: Field testing found the Danish RMI relevant and user-friendly. Corrected item-total correlations were ≥0.47 and item responses fitted the Guttman pattern. There was a 47.5% ceiling effect, and reliability was 0.91. Correlations supported construct validity. CONCLUSION: The Danish RMI is user-friendly, unidimensional, reliable, and valid. The results correspond to those previously reported with the original UK RMI version. Ceiling effects are limiting but sample related. Larger samples representing a wider variety of MS severities are needed for firmer evaluation of the Danish RMI.}}, author = {{Steen Krawcyk, R and Hagell, Peter and Sjödahl Hammarlund, Catharina}}, issn = {{1600-0404}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{20--25}}, publisher = {{Wiley-Blackwell}}, series = {{Acta Neurologica Scandinavica}}, title = {{Danish translation and psychometric testing of the Rivermead Mobility Index.}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ane.12144}}, doi = {{10.1111/ane.12144}}, volume = {{128}}, year = {{2013}}, }