Capital and Coercion : Slavery after the 1807 Import Ban in the Cape Colony
(2025) In European Review of Economic History- Abstract
- The 1807 Slave Trade Act banned slave imports across the British Empire, triggering a sharp supply shock. Using newly digitised tax censuses from the Cape Colony, this article examines how households in Stellenbosch and Graaff-Reinet adjusted. Despite stark ecological and institutional differences, both districts show similar post-abolition trajectories. This challenges models linking coercion to land–labour ratios, supervision costs, or frontier openness. Testing five frameworks, the paper finds strongest support for the view of slaves as capital assets. Wealthier households continued accumulating slaves, suggesting slavery persisted not only as labour but as an asset strategy amid capital scarcity.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/a1be4502-223c-467a-bd26-b4ed64f4d788
- author
- Martins, Igor
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2025-09-29
- type
- Contribution to specialist publication or newspaper
- publication status
- in press
- subject
- in
- European Review of Economic History
- publisher
- Oxford University Press
- ISSN
- 1361-4916
- project
- The establishment, growth and legacy of a settler colony: Quantitative panel studies of the political economy of Cape Colony
- The Cape of the Good Hope Panel: Long-term studies of growth, inequality and labour coercion in the global south
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- a1be4502-223c-467a-bd26-b4ed64f4d788
- date added to LUP
- 2025-06-23 20:40:07
- date last changed
- 2025-09-30 11:25:47
@misc{a1be4502-223c-467a-bd26-b4ed64f4d788, abstract = {{The 1807 Slave Trade Act banned slave imports across the British Empire, triggering a sharp supply shock. Using newly digitised tax censuses from the Cape Colony, this article examines how households in Stellenbosch and Graaff-Reinet adjusted. Despite stark ecological and institutional differences, both districts show similar post-abolition trajectories. This challenges models linking coercion to land–labour ratios, supervision costs, or frontier openness. Testing five frameworks, the paper finds strongest support for the view of slaves as capital assets. Wealthier households continued accumulating slaves, suggesting slavery persisted not only as labour but as an asset strategy amid capital scarcity.}}, author = {{Martins, Igor}}, issn = {{1361-4916}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{09}}, publisher = {{Oxford University Press}}, series = {{European Review of Economic History}}, title = {{Capital and Coercion : Slavery after the 1807 Import Ban in the Cape Colony}}, year = {{2025}}, }