Exploring student engagement and motivation : insights from a case competition
(2025)- Abstract
- This study evaluates the design choices of a two-day, industry-collaborative case competition at Campus Helsingborg and their effect on student motivation and engagement. Using pre and post Self-Determination Theory surveys, observations, and interviews we observed very high intrinsic (4.82/5) and extrinsic motivation (4.33/5). The perceived value of competition elements increased consistently after participation. Authentic briefs, mentor access, and a staged workflow with a public pitch to an external jury supported focus, learning, and professional readiness. Autonomy was enabled by open problem framing, competence by sequenced practice and iterative feedback, and relatedness by peer, mentor, and industry interactions.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/a470e359-a8a0-4ec3-b4cd-16f193700847
- author
- Vakulenko, Yulia
LU
and Hellström, Daniel
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2025-12-05
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- host publication
- Proceedings 2025 : 13:e pedagogiska inspirationskonferensen 4 december 2025 - 13:e pedagogiska inspirationskonferensen 4 december 2025
- pages
- 3 pages
- publisher
- Center for Engineering Education, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- a470e359-a8a0-4ec3-b4cd-16f193700847
- alternative location
- https://www.lth.se/fileadmin/cee/genombrottet/konferens2025/F4_Vakulenko_Hellstrom.pdf
- date added to LUP
- 2025-12-08 15:01:07
- date last changed
- 2025-12-11 13:55:52
@inproceedings{a470e359-a8a0-4ec3-b4cd-16f193700847,
abstract = {{This study evaluates the design choices of a two-day, industry-collaborative case competition at Campus Helsingborg and their effect on student motivation and engagement. Using pre and post Self-Determination Theory surveys, observations, and interviews we observed very high intrinsic (4.82/5) and extrinsic motivation (4.33/5). The perceived value of competition elements increased consistently after participation. Authentic briefs, mentor access, and a staged workflow with a public pitch to an external jury supported focus, learning, and professional readiness. Autonomy was enabled by open problem framing, competence by sequenced practice and iterative feedback, and relatedness by peer, mentor, and industry interactions.}},
author = {{Vakulenko, Yulia and Hellström, Daniel}},
booktitle = {{Proceedings 2025 : 13:e pedagogiska inspirationskonferensen 4 december 2025}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{12}},
publisher = {{Center for Engineering Education, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University}},
title = {{Exploring student engagement and motivation : insights from a case competition}},
url = {{https://www.lth.se/fileadmin/cee/genombrottet/konferens2025/F4_Vakulenko_Hellstrom.pdf}},
year = {{2025}},
}