On the perceived usefulness of risk descriptions for decision-making in disaster risk management
(2015) In Reliability Engineering & System Safety 142. p.48-55- Abstract
- Managing risk using an “all-hazards” and “whole of society”-approach involves extensive communication of risk descriptions among many stakeholders. In the present study we investigate how professionals working with disaster risk management in such contexts perceive the usefulness of different descriptions of risk. Empirical data from the Swedish disaster risk management system were used in an attempt to investigate the aspects of a risk description that affect its usefulness (as perceived by professionals). Thirty-three local municipal risk and vulnerability assessments (RVA documents) produced in the region of Scania in 2012 were
analyzed in terms of six variables. The documents were then ranked by professionals based on their... (More) - Managing risk using an “all-hazards” and “whole of society”-approach involves extensive communication of risk descriptions among many stakeholders. In the present study we investigate how professionals working with disaster risk management in such contexts perceive the usefulness of different descriptions of risk. Empirical data from the Swedish disaster risk management system were used in an attempt to investigate the aspects of a risk description that affect its usefulness (as perceived by professionals). Thirty-three local municipal risk and vulnerability assessments (RVA documents) produced in the region of Scania in 2012 were
analyzed in terms of six variables. The documents were then ranked by professionals based on their perceived usefulness for decision-making. Statistical analysis was conducted to identify any possible correlations between the overall ranking of the usefulness of the municipal RVA:s and
each of the variables. We conclude that the way the likelihood and consequences of scenarios are described influence the perceived usefulness of a risk description. Furthermore, whether descriptions of scenarios are included in a risk description or not, and whether background information concerning the likelihood of scenarios are included also influence perceived
usefulness of risk descriptions. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/5464129
- author
- Lin, Lexin LU ; Nilsson, Anders ; Sjölin, Johan ; Abrahamsson, Marcus LU and Tehler, Henrik LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2015
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- description of risk, risk and vulnerability assessment, disaster risk management, risk communication, usefulness, decision-making
- in
- Reliability Engineering & System Safety
- volume
- 142
- pages
- 48 - 55
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000359172400006
- scopus:84929612751
- ISSN
- 0951-8320
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ress.2015.04.012
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- a5e578de-fb56-4384-8392-988955733141 (old id 5464129)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 13:53:01
- date last changed
- 2022-02-19 07:57:36
@article{a5e578de-fb56-4384-8392-988955733141, abstract = {{Managing risk using an “all-hazards” and “whole of society”-approach involves extensive communication of risk descriptions among many stakeholders. In the present study we investigate how professionals working with disaster risk management in such contexts perceive the usefulness of different descriptions of risk. Empirical data from the Swedish disaster risk management system were used in an attempt to investigate the aspects of a risk description that affect its usefulness (as perceived by professionals). Thirty-three local municipal risk and vulnerability assessments (RVA documents) produced in the region of Scania in 2012 were<br/><br> analyzed in terms of six variables. The documents were then ranked by professionals based on their perceived usefulness for decision-making. Statistical analysis was conducted to identify any possible correlations between the overall ranking of the usefulness of the municipal RVA:s and<br/><br> each of the variables. We conclude that the way the likelihood and consequences of scenarios are described influence the perceived usefulness of a risk description. Furthermore, whether descriptions of scenarios are included in a risk description or not, and whether background information concerning the likelihood of scenarios are included also influence perceived<br/><br> usefulness of risk descriptions.}}, author = {{Lin, Lexin and Nilsson, Anders and Sjölin, Johan and Abrahamsson, Marcus and Tehler, Henrik}}, issn = {{0951-8320}}, keywords = {{description of risk; risk and vulnerability assessment; disaster risk management; risk communication; usefulness; decision-making}}, language = {{eng}}, pages = {{48--55}}, publisher = {{Elsevier}}, series = {{Reliability Engineering & System Safety}}, title = {{On the perceived usefulness of risk descriptions for decision-making in disaster risk management}}, url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/3646302/5464138.pdf}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.ress.2015.04.012}}, volume = {{142}}, year = {{2015}}, }