Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Knowing Other Minds : A Scorekeeping Model

Lo Presti, Patrizio LU orcid (2023) In Review of Philosophy and Psychology 14(4). p.1279-1308
Abstract

The prepositional ‘in’ and possessive pronouns, e.g., ‘my’ and ‘mine,’ in the context of attributions of mental states, such as “in my mind” or “in your mind,” threaten to confuse attempts to account for knowledge of other minds. This paper distinguishes proper from improper uses of such expressions. I will argue that proper use of the prepositional ‘in’ and possessive pronouns in the context of mental state attributions presupposes capacities to properly track and attribute what are really, in a sense to be specified, intersubjectively articulated and inferentially interrelated normative statuses. What we call “mental states” or “minds,” in as far as primarily cognitive states such as beliefs are concerned, are intersubjectively... (More)

The prepositional ‘in’ and possessive pronouns, e.g., ‘my’ and ‘mine,’ in the context of attributions of mental states, such as “in my mind” or “in your mind,” threaten to confuse attempts to account for knowledge of other minds. This paper distinguishes proper from improper uses of such expressions. I will argue that proper use of the prepositional ‘in’ and possessive pronouns in the context of mental state attributions presupposes capacities to properly track and attribute what are really, in a sense to be specified, intersubjectively articulated and inferentially interrelated normative statuses. What we call “mental states” or “minds,” in as far as primarily cognitive states such as beliefs are concerned, are intersubjectively constituted. As opposed to being inner and private, something we must learn to intersubjectively discover, minds and mental states are intersubjectively articulated and we learn to attribute them as inner and private. A scorekeeping-model is used to illustrate how the privacy of mind presupposes intersubjectivity. Using that model, I argue that the traditional problem of knowing other minds can be re-framed as a problem of learning how to pursue intersubjective practices of acknowledging, attributing and undertaking mental states.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Developmental psychology, Intersubjectivity, Me-ness, Normativity, Other minds, Scorekeeping
in
Review of Philosophy and Psychology
volume
14
issue
4
pages
30 pages
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • scopus:85138013644
ISSN
1878-5166
DOI
10.1007/s13164-022-00642-0
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
ac75684a-3e5a-46b5-8ba3-648e104d87d5
date added to LUP
2022-02-21 16:19:32
date last changed
2024-01-09 15:48:08
@article{ac75684a-3e5a-46b5-8ba3-648e104d87d5,
  abstract     = {{<p>The prepositional ‘in’ and possessive pronouns, e.g., ‘my’ and ‘mine,’ in the context of attributions of mental states, such as “in my mind” or “in your mind,” threaten to confuse attempts to account for knowledge of other minds. This paper distinguishes proper from improper uses of such expressions. I will argue that proper use of the prepositional ‘in’ and possessive pronouns in the context of mental state attributions presupposes capacities to properly track and attribute what are really, in a sense to be specified, intersubjectively articulated and inferentially interrelated normative statuses. What we call “mental states” or “minds,” in as far as primarily cognitive states such as beliefs are concerned, are intersubjectively constituted. As opposed to being inner and private, something we must learn to intersubjectively discover, minds and mental states are intersubjectively articulated and we learn to attribute them as inner and private. A scorekeeping-model is used to illustrate how the privacy of mind presupposes intersubjectivity. Using that model, I argue that the traditional problem of knowing other minds can be re-framed as a problem of learning how to pursue intersubjective practices of acknowledging, attributing and undertaking mental states.</p>}},
  author       = {{Lo Presti, Patrizio}},
  issn         = {{1878-5166}},
  keywords     = {{Developmental psychology; Intersubjectivity; Me-ness; Normativity; Other minds; Scorekeeping}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{1279--1308}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  series       = {{Review of Philosophy and Psychology}},
  title        = {{Knowing Other Minds : A Scorekeeping Model}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13164-022-00642-0}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s13164-022-00642-0}},
  volume       = {{14}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}