Advanced

Conditionals in therapy and counseling sessions : Therapists' and clients' uses of what-if constructions

Hartman, Jenny LU (2019) In Journal of Pragmatics 140. p.112-126
Abstract
Based on transcribed spoken data, this study explores therapists’ and clients’ uses of what-if constructions in therapy and counseling sessions. It seeks to establish how these constructions are used, whether there are usage differences between these two groups of speakers, and, if so, how such differences can be explained. The study concludes that both therapists and clients use what if, but they do so to satisfy different communicative needs. Clients primarily use what if to convey worry and doubt (What if don’t like it there?), whereas therapists use what if to summarize and re-construe their clients' worries, to present alternative perspectives and entertain potential consequences (What if you gave up your guilt?). Both groups of... (More)
Based on transcribed spoken data, this study explores therapists’ and clients’ uses of what-if constructions in therapy and counseling sessions. It seeks to establish how these constructions are used, whether there are usage differences between these two groups of speakers, and, if so, how such differences can be explained. The study concludes that both therapists and clients use what if, but they do so to satisfy different communicative needs. Clients primarily use what if to convey worry and doubt (What if don’t like it there?), whereas therapists use what if to summarize and re-construe their clients' worries, to present alternative perspectives and entertain potential consequences (What if you gave up your guilt?). Both groups of speakers use what if to prompt (re)enactment of scenarios, often in connection with metarepresented speech and thought (I was like, “What if he is here?”). The study offers linguistic support for clinical observations concerning the prevalence of what-if reasoning in anxiety disorders, and additionally illustrates how therapists use language to trigger reality-distancing in their clients. Through a systematic application of Chilton’s Deictic Space Theory, the study demonstrates the utility of a cognitive linguistic approach to the consideration of interactive spoken data. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Journal of Pragmatics
volume
140
pages
112 - 126
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:85058509618
ISSN
0378-2166
DOI
10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.003
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
b01c0a9d-0d5c-4182-bf3b-da67e4a325d2
date added to LUP
2018-12-05 08:32:34
date last changed
2019-02-20 11:39:01
@article{b01c0a9d-0d5c-4182-bf3b-da67e4a325d2,
  abstract     = {Based on transcribed spoken data, this study explores therapists’ and clients’ uses of what-if constructions in therapy and counseling sessions. It seeks to establish how these constructions are used, whether there are usage differences between these two groups of speakers, and, if so, how such differences can be explained. The study concludes that both therapists and clients use what if, but they do so to satisfy different communicative needs. Clients primarily use what if to convey worry and doubt (What if don’t like it there?), whereas therapists use what if to summarize and re-construe their clients' worries, to present alternative perspectives and entertain potential consequences (What if you gave up your guilt?). Both groups of speakers use what if to prompt (re)enactment of scenarios, often in connection with metarepresented speech and thought (I was like, “What if he is here?”). The study offers linguistic support for clinical observations concerning the prevalence of what-if reasoning in anxiety disorders, and additionally illustrates how therapists use language to trigger reality-distancing in their clients. Through a systematic application of Chilton’s Deictic Space Theory, the study demonstrates the utility of a cognitive linguistic approach to the consideration of interactive spoken data.},
  author       = {Hartman, Jenny},
  issn         = {0378-2166},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {112--126},
  publisher    = {Elsevier},
  series       = {Journal of Pragmatics},
  title        = {Conditionals in therapy and counseling sessions : Therapists' and clients' uses of <i>what-if </i>constructions},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.003},
  volume       = {140},
  year         = {2019},
}