Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Factor structure of the Friends and Family interview

Psouni, Elia LU orcid ; Breinholst, Sonja ; Hoff Esbjørn, Barbara and Steele, Howard (2020) In Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 61(3). p.460-469
Abstract

The aim of this study was to specify the latent construct structure of the Friends and Family Interview (FFI: Steele & Steele, 2005) based on its dimensional scale coding protocol. The FFI is a semi-structured interview measuring attachment in middle childhood. We analyzed data from 341 FFI interviews with children aged 7–12 years, recruited in the Scandinavian Öresund Region. Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed a three-component model as best fitting the data. The first component, denoting attachment security, gathered all dimensional scales for evidence of secure base/safe haven regarding mother/father and coherence in the child’s narrative style, along with scales regarding reflective functioning, self-perception, and social... (More)

The aim of this study was to specify the latent construct structure of the Friends and Family Interview (FFI: Steele & Steele, 2005) based on its dimensional scale coding protocol. The FFI is a semi-structured interview measuring attachment in middle childhood. We analyzed data from 341 FFI interviews with children aged 7–12 years, recruited in the Scandinavian Öresund Region. Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed a three-component model as best fitting the data. The first component, denoting attachment security, gathered all dimensional scales for evidence of secure base/safe haven regarding mother/father and coherence in the child’s narrative style, along with scales regarding reflective functioning, self-perception, and social functioning. The second component comprised preoccupying feelings of anger, but also derogation. The third component gathered all scales coding idealization. Inter-relations among the components were consistent with attachment theory, and respondents’ scores for all three components differed significantly across the four categorical attachment classifications. Affect regulation of negative emotion through anger and through derogation co-occurred, and was distinct from regulation through maintaining a belief that things are better than they appear (idealization). These two affect regulation strategies appeared commonly when reflective functioning, and an organized self-perception, and positive peer relations were less in evidence. The multi-dimensional FFI coding system appears to measure successfully these diverse features of the child’s narrative provided in response to the interview. Overall, our findings support the construct validity of the FFI and provide further evidence of its usefulness for assessing attachment in middle childhood and early adolescence.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Attachment dimensions, exploratory factor analysis, Friends and Family Interview, middle childhood, reflective functioning
in
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
volume
61
issue
3
pages
10 pages
publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
external identifiers
  • pmid:31896167
  • scopus:85078244577
ISSN
0036-5564
DOI
10.1111/sjop.12604
project
Construct Structure of the Friends and Family Interview (FFI)
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
b4502f83-ad17-4092-87d7-c99cfec3e770
date added to LUP
2020-02-06 13:04:00
date last changed
2024-04-17 03:05:30
@article{b4502f83-ad17-4092-87d7-c99cfec3e770,
  abstract     = {{<p>The aim of this study was to specify the latent construct structure of the Friends and Family Interview (FFI: Steele &amp; Steele, 2005) based on its dimensional scale coding protocol. The FFI is a semi-structured interview measuring attachment in middle childhood. We analyzed data from 341 FFI interviews with children aged 7–12 years, recruited in the Scandinavian Öresund Region. Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed a three-component model as best fitting the data. The first component, denoting attachment security, gathered all dimensional scales for evidence of secure base/safe haven regarding mother/father and coherence in the child’s narrative style, along with scales regarding reflective functioning, self-perception, and social functioning. The second component comprised preoccupying feelings of anger, but also derogation. The third component gathered all scales coding idealization. Inter-relations among the components were consistent with attachment theory, and respondents’ scores for all three components differed significantly across the four categorical attachment classifications. Affect regulation of negative emotion through anger and through derogation co-occurred, and was distinct from regulation through maintaining a belief that things are better than they appear (idealization). These two affect regulation strategies appeared commonly when reflective functioning, and an organized self-perception, and positive peer relations were less in evidence. The multi-dimensional FFI coding system appears to measure successfully these diverse features of the child’s narrative provided in response to the interview. Overall, our findings support the construct validity of the FFI and provide further evidence of its usefulness for assessing attachment in middle childhood and early adolescence.</p>}},
  author       = {{Psouni, Elia and Breinholst, Sonja and Hoff Esbjørn, Barbara and Steele, Howard}},
  issn         = {{0036-5564}},
  keywords     = {{Attachment dimensions; exploratory factor analysis; Friends and Family Interview; middle childhood; reflective functioning}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{460--469}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley-Blackwell}},
  series       = {{Scandinavian Journal of Psychology}},
  title        = {{Factor structure of the Friends and Family interview}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12604}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/sjop.12604}},
  volume       = {{61}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}