Assessment of Commonly used Tool Life Models in Metal Cutting
(2017) In Procedia Manufacturing 11. p.602-609- Abstract
In this work, eleven different combinations of work piece materials and tool grades have been evaluated in wear test when turning with cemented carbide insert. The most commonly used tool life models such as the Taylor model, the Extended Taylor model, the Coromant Turning model version 1 and the Colding model have been tested on the data and their accuracy is presented. The well-known Taylor model proves to have a limited ability to reproduce the data. The most accurate model is the Colding model, with an average model error of approximately 4.0% and Woxén equivalent chip thickness proves to work well for all presented tool life models. This work also discusses the models ability to reproduce cutting data for finishing operations and... (More)
In this work, eleven different combinations of work piece materials and tool grades have been evaluated in wear test when turning with cemented carbide insert. The most commonly used tool life models such as the Taylor model, the Extended Taylor model, the Coromant Turning model version 1 and the Colding model have been tested on the data and their accuracy is presented. The well-known Taylor model proves to have a limited ability to reproduce the data. The most accurate model is the Colding model, with an average model error of approximately 4.0% and Woxén equivalent chip thickness proves to work well for all presented tool life models. This work also discusses the models ability to reproduce cutting data for finishing operations and possible limitations when extrapolating the models for smaller chip thicknesses.
(Less)
- author
- Johansson, Daniel LU ; Hägglund, Sören ; Bushlya, Volodymyr LU and Ståhl, Jan Eric LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2017
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Colding Equation, Machining, Taylor Tool Life Model, Tool life, Turning
- in
- Procedia Manufacturing
- volume
- 11
- pages
- 8 pages
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85029877723
- ISSN
- 2351-9789
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.154
- project
- Flintstone2020
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- b93247c2-d29f-411a-b16c-38c90f30ba27
- date added to LUP
- 2017-10-09 14:20:24
- date last changed
- 2022-04-01 19:56:16
@article{b93247c2-d29f-411a-b16c-38c90f30ba27,
abstract = {{<p>In this work, eleven different combinations of work piece materials and tool grades have been evaluated in wear test when turning with cemented carbide insert. The most commonly used tool life models such as the Taylor model, the Extended Taylor model, the Coromant Turning model version 1 and the Colding model have been tested on the data and their accuracy is presented. The well-known Taylor model proves to have a limited ability to reproduce the data. The most accurate model is the Colding model, with an average model error of approximately 4.0% and Woxén equivalent chip thickness proves to work well for all presented tool life models. This work also discusses the models ability to reproduce cutting data for finishing operations and possible limitations when extrapolating the models for smaller chip thicknesses.</p>}},
author = {{Johansson, Daniel and Hägglund, Sören and Bushlya, Volodymyr and Ståhl, Jan Eric}},
issn = {{2351-9789}},
keywords = {{Colding Equation; Machining; Taylor Tool Life Model; Tool life; Turning}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{602--609}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Procedia Manufacturing}},
title = {{Assessment of Commonly used Tool Life Models in Metal Cutting}},
url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/61985840/Assessment_of_different_tool_life_models_submitted_manuscript.pdf}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.154}},
volume = {{11}},
year = {{2017}},
}