Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Occupant behavioural freedom in building energy use

de Wilde, Pieter LU orcid ; Aly, Dalia ; Cho, Seongkwon ; Kim, Jin Hong ; Kim, Sunghyun and Park, Cheol Soo (2025) In Applied Energy 377.
Abstract

Building occupant behaviour is known to be an important factor that drives building energy use and the associated carbon emissions. A substantial body of work has investigated occupant behaviour and the underlying drivers. Yet it is generally known that some buildings allow only minimal behavioural intervention, such as on/off control of lights. Other buildings allow a much higher degree of intervention, for instance through setting of temperature set-points, ventilation fan speed control, the opening/closing of windows, and blind operation. This paper explores the constraints that buildings pose to the freedom of occupants to vary their behaviour and attempts to quantify these building-specific constraints. It reviews the literature on... (More)

Building occupant behaviour is known to be an important factor that drives building energy use and the associated carbon emissions. A substantial body of work has investigated occupant behaviour and the underlying drivers. Yet it is generally known that some buildings allow only minimal behavioural intervention, such as on/off control of lights. Other buildings allow a much higher degree of intervention, for instance through setting of temperature set-points, ventilation fan speed control, the opening/closing of windows, and blind operation. This paper explores the constraints that buildings pose to the freedom of occupants to vary their behaviour and attempts to quantify these building-specific constraints. It reviews the literature on occupant behaviour with a focus on constraints and degrees of freedom that these occupants are allowed. The concept of “occupant behavioural freedom” (OBF) is introduced to capture and quantify these constraints. Case studies are presented to show the application of the concept to real buildings, and to explore how the available occupant freedom relates to actually observed behaviour. Residential cases show a high occupant behavioural freedom, in the order of 95 %. An industrial case has a significantly lower freedom, in the order of 25 % only. At the same time, empirical data show that further constraints limit how much of this freedom can actually be used to save energy: only around 25 % in the residential case, to virtually nothing in the industrial case.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Degrees of freedom, Energy savings, Monitoring, Occupant behaviour, Occupant control
in
Applied Energy
volume
377
article number
124682
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:85206185188
ISSN
0306-2619
DOI
10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124682
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
baefac51-a0c2-4718-ae48-7aff9651f6c7
date added to LUP
2024-11-27 13:28:55
date last changed
2025-04-04 14:44:38
@article{baefac51-a0c2-4718-ae48-7aff9651f6c7,
  abstract     = {{<p>Building occupant behaviour is known to be an important factor that drives building energy use and the associated carbon emissions. A substantial body of work has investigated occupant behaviour and the underlying drivers. Yet it is generally known that some buildings allow only minimal behavioural intervention, such as on/off control of lights. Other buildings allow a much higher degree of intervention, for instance through setting of temperature set-points, ventilation fan speed control, the opening/closing of windows, and blind operation. This paper explores the constraints that buildings pose to the freedom of occupants to vary their behaviour and attempts to quantify these building-specific constraints. It reviews the literature on occupant behaviour with a focus on constraints and degrees of freedom that these occupants are allowed. The concept of “occupant behavioural freedom” (OBF) is introduced to capture and quantify these constraints. Case studies are presented to show the application of the concept to real buildings, and to explore how the available occupant freedom relates to actually observed behaviour. Residential cases show a high occupant behavioural freedom, in the order of 95 %. An industrial case has a significantly lower freedom, in the order of 25 % only. At the same time, empirical data show that further constraints limit how much of this freedom can actually be used to save energy: only around 25 % in the residential case, to virtually nothing in the industrial case.</p>}},
  author       = {{de Wilde, Pieter and Aly, Dalia and Cho, Seongkwon and Kim, Jin Hong and Kim, Sunghyun and Park, Cheol Soo}},
  issn         = {{0306-2619}},
  keywords     = {{Degrees of freedom; Energy savings; Monitoring; Occupant behaviour; Occupant control}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{01}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Applied Energy}},
  title        = {{Occupant behavioural freedom in building energy use}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124682}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124682}},
  volume       = {{377}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}