Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Innovation and Governance arrangements of Aquathermal Energy systems; A multi-case analysis of WaterWarmth pilots

Mohlakoana, Nthabi ; Brogaard, Sara LU ; Ness, Barry LU ; Micallef Nilsson, Annsofie LU and Hoppe, Thomas (2025) In Work Package 6
Abstract
The aim of this Work Package 6 (WP6) report is to describe and analyze insights from Interreg North Sea
WaterWarmth demonstration pilots. Specifically, WP6 examines the pilots' innovation and governance
arrangements that help implementation and scaling of aqua thermal energy (AE) systems in real-world
contexts. The work is therefore primarily based on lessons learned through a mixed methods approach with
the Interreg North Sea WaterWarmth project pilots. To help address the shortage of knowledge on innovation
of AE systems, this report builds on frameworks previously used in WP6 work (see Deliverable 6.1; Hoppe
et al., 2024) where a mapping of theoretical frameworks and a typology to analyze governance of AE... (More)
The aim of this Work Package 6 (WP6) report is to describe and analyze insights from Interreg North Sea
WaterWarmth demonstration pilots. Specifically, WP6 examines the pilots' innovation and governance
arrangements that help implementation and scaling of aqua thermal energy (AE) systems in real-world
contexts. The work is therefore primarily based on lessons learned through a mixed methods approach with
the Interreg North Sea WaterWarmth project pilots. To help address the shortage of knowledge on innovation
of AE systems, this report builds on frameworks previously used in WP6 work (see Deliverable 6.1; Hoppe
et al., 2024) where a mapping of theoretical frameworks and a typology to analyze governance of AE and
other heating systems was performed. Particularly, we are applying three of the approaches and theoretical
frameworks from Deliverable 6.1 from various scholarly backgrounds. For example, the multi-level
perspective (MLP) and Strategic Niche Management (SNM) have a background in Science-and Technology
Systems studies, Transition Studies and Evolutionary Economics, while Governance Arrangements (GA) has
its roots in Governance and Policy Studies. As the focus of this report is on bottom-up niche level
developments, we use concepts from SNM involving voicing and shaping of expectations, network formation,
and learning. The pilots are implemented under societal conditions and hence also influenced by the existing
heating regimes. Therefore, we address challenges and tensions, which we assume indicates incumbent
regime influence that often hinders AE innovation development applying the MLP. Finally, we are interested
in what role governance, and more specifically, regulation plays in pilots. This refers to organization authority
and legitimacy, the role of government, and policy instruments like regulations, permit systems, and/ or
subsidies.
For this report, nine pilot projects using an exploratory multi-case study approach were studied. The first
questions for mapping the AE projects were posed to individual pilot leads in an online survey in April 2024.
A workshop with the pilots was then held in Caen, France in May 2024. Following this, semi-structured
interviews were performed with nine key pilot study respondents throughout the autumn of 2024. The results
are assessed for each pilot within this report, and a synthesis analysis is presented followed by conclusions
and policy recommendations. Results show that not all nine pilots have a vision. Four of the pilots indicate
they do not yet have a vision, while five others indicate they. Four pilots are located in municipalities that
operate a municipal heat vision. Networking was observed to occur in various forms across the pilots. In
several projects networking was seen as a way to attract key stakeholders, with projects having internal
guidelines on how to select stakeholders who are considered desireful to join the network. This includes
having frequent and also bilateral meetings with local stakeholders, in two cases leading to the formation of
a local heat coalition. However, networking was also observed as a way to mobilize intra (organization- and
intra-municipal capacity to advocate AE in regional policy making, so as to develop and adapt policy
frameworks and planning schemes. Learning was practiced in different ways among the pilots. First, learning
takes place by involving local stakeholders in projects and benefiting from their experiences and perceptions.
In some of the pilots this even entailed citizen participation and co-creation of plans. In five pilots learning
from past experiences of other and past, similar pilots occurred. Learning was also observed to occur in a
reflective way. For example, by monitoring and reflecting on one’s own project planning and implementation
process. As well as learning from monitoring progress, ongoing data collection, developing a knowledge
base. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Book/Report
publication status
published
subject
in
Work Package 6
issue
6.2
pages
40 pages
publisher
Interreg North Sea
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
be45bfb5-0497-4a69-8bd5-a1ecd51480ca
date added to LUP
2026-02-23 13:47:17
date last changed
2026-02-24 15:25:26
@techreport{be45bfb5-0497-4a69-8bd5-a1ecd51480ca,
  abstract     = {{The aim of this Work Package 6 (WP6) report is to describe and analyze insights from Interreg North Sea<br/>WaterWarmth demonstration pilots. Specifically, WP6 examines the pilots' innovation and governance<br/>arrangements that help implementation and scaling of aqua thermal energy (AE) systems in real-world<br/>contexts. The work is therefore primarily based on lessons learned through a mixed methods approach with<br/>the Interreg North Sea WaterWarmth project pilots. To help address the shortage of knowledge on innovation<br/>of AE systems, this report builds on frameworks previously used in WP6 work (see Deliverable 6.1; Hoppe<br/>et al., 2024) where a mapping of theoretical frameworks and a typology to analyze governance of AE and<br/>other heating systems was performed. Particularly, we are applying three of the approaches and theoretical<br/>frameworks from Deliverable 6.1 from various scholarly backgrounds. For example, the multi-level<br/>perspective (MLP) and Strategic Niche Management (SNM) have a background in Science-and Technology<br/>Systems studies, Transition Studies and Evolutionary Economics, while Governance Arrangements (GA) has<br/>its roots in Governance and Policy Studies. As the focus of this report is on bottom-up niche level<br/>developments, we use concepts from SNM involving voicing and shaping of expectations, network formation,<br/>and learning. The pilots are implemented under societal conditions and hence also influenced by the existing<br/>heating regimes. Therefore, we address challenges and tensions, which we assume indicates incumbent<br/>regime influence that often hinders AE innovation development applying the MLP. Finally, we are interested<br/>in what role governance, and more specifically, regulation plays in pilots. This refers to organization authority<br/>and legitimacy, the role of government, and policy instruments like regulations, permit systems, and/ or<br/>subsidies.<br/>For this report, nine pilot projects using an exploratory multi-case study approach were studied. The first<br/>questions for mapping the AE projects were posed to individual pilot leads in an online survey in April 2024.<br/>A workshop with the pilots was then held in Caen, France in May 2024. Following this, semi-structured<br/>interviews were performed with nine key pilot study respondents throughout the autumn of 2024. The results<br/>are assessed for each pilot within this report, and a synthesis analysis is presented followed by conclusions<br/>and policy recommendations. Results show that not all nine pilots have a vision. Four of the pilots indicate<br/>they do not yet have a vision, while five others indicate they. Four pilots are located in municipalities that<br/>operate a municipal heat vision. Networking was observed to occur in various forms across the pilots. In<br/>several projects networking was seen as a way to attract key stakeholders, with projects having internal<br/>guidelines on how to select stakeholders who are considered desireful to join the network. This includes<br/>having frequent and also bilateral meetings with local stakeholders, in two cases leading to the formation of<br/>a local heat coalition. However, networking was also observed as a way to mobilize intra (organization- and<br/>intra-municipal capacity to advocate AE in regional policy making, so as to develop and adapt policy<br/>frameworks and planning schemes. Learning was practiced in different ways among the pilots. First, learning<br/>takes place by involving local stakeholders in projects and benefiting from their experiences and perceptions.<br/>In some of the pilots this even entailed citizen participation and co-creation of plans. In five pilots learning<br/>from past experiences of other and past, similar pilots occurred. Learning was also observed to occur in a<br/>reflective way. For example, by monitoring and reflecting on one’s own project planning and implementation<br/>process. As well as learning from monitoring progress, ongoing data collection, developing a knowledge<br/>base.}},
  author       = {{Mohlakoana, Nthabi and Brogaard, Sara and Ness, Barry and Micallef Nilsson, Annsofie and Hoppe, Thomas}},
  institution  = {{Interreg North Sea}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{04}},
  number       = {{6.2}},
  series       = {{Work Package 6}},
  title        = {{Innovation and Governance arrangements of Aquathermal Energy systems; A multi-case analysis of WaterWarmth pilots}},
  url          = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/243054100/WP6.2.report.Innovation_and_Governance_1.pdf}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}