Undantag från kravet på etikprövning av humanistisk och samhällsvetenskaplig forskning. En internationell utblick
(2023) In Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift 125(4). p.1143-1168- Abstract (Swedish)
- The Swedish ethical review system has recently come under heavy criticism - criticism that has largely centered on the system’s negative impact on research in the humanities and social sciences. Among other things, it has been claimed that the requirement for ethical review is unnecessarily comprehensive. One way of exploring the reasonableness of the Swedish system is to compare it with the rules and considerations found in other jurisdictions regarding the type of research project that needs to undergo ethical review. This study compares the Swedish system with a sample of systems found in Europe, the USA, Canada, and Australia. A number of exemptions from the requirements of ethical review are identified and discussed. These exemptions... (More)
- The Swedish ethical review system has recently come under heavy criticism - criticism that has largely centered on the system’s negative impact on research in the humanities and social sciences. Among other things, it has been claimed that the requirement for ethical review is unnecessarily comprehensive. One way of exploring the reasonableness of the Swedish system is to compare it with the rules and considerations found in other jurisdictions regarding the type of research project that needs to undergo ethical review. This study compares the Swedish system with a sample of systems found in Europe, the USA, Canada, and Australia. A number of exemptions from the requirements of ethical review are identified and discussed. These exemptions that can serve as a starting point for further analyses and changes to the Swedish system. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/c7d61a08-951f-468c-b60e-a1c6d74d6f20
- author
- Johansson, Mats LU ; Bülow, William ; Persson, Vilhelm LU and Wahlberg, Lena LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2023-09-22
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- etikprövning, ethical review
- in
- Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift
- volume
- 125
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 1143 - 1168
- publisher
- Fahlbeckska stiftelsen
- ISSN
- 0039-0747
- project
- Strain at a gnat and swallow a camel? Ethical review of humanities and social sciences fit for purpose
- language
- Swedish
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- c7d61a08-951f-468c-b60e-a1c6d74d6f20
- date added to LUP
- 2023-09-22 15:57:06
- date last changed
- 2024-01-15 13:59:32
@article{c7d61a08-951f-468c-b60e-a1c6d74d6f20, abstract = {{The Swedish ethical review system has recently come under heavy criticism - criticism that has largely centered on the system’s negative impact on research in the humanities and social sciences. Among other things, it has been claimed that the requirement for ethical review is unnecessarily comprehensive. One way of exploring the reasonableness of the Swedish system is to compare it with the rules and considerations found in other jurisdictions regarding the type of research project that needs to undergo ethical review. This study compares the Swedish system with a sample of systems found in Europe, the USA, Canada, and Australia. A number of exemptions from the requirements of ethical review are identified and discussed. These exemptions that can serve as a starting point for further analyses and changes to the Swedish system.}}, author = {{Johansson, Mats and Bülow, William and Persson, Vilhelm and Wahlberg, Lena}}, issn = {{0039-0747}}, keywords = {{etikprövning; ethical review}}, language = {{swe}}, month = {{09}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{1143--1168}}, publisher = {{Fahlbeckska stiftelsen}}, series = {{Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift}}, title = {{Undantag från kravet på etikprövning av humanistisk och samhällsvetenskaplig forskning. En internationell utblick}}, url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/159224683/StvT_2023_nr_4_pages_1143_1168_Johansson_et_al_.pdf}}, volume = {{125}}, year = {{2023}}, }