Enhancing Core Loss Tracking Accuracy in Stator Cores : A Comparative Assessment of Static and Dynamic Jiles-Atherton Model Formulations
Colombo, Leonardo LU ; Reinap, Avo LU
; Fyhr, Pontus
LU
and Alaküla, Mats
LU
(2025)
In IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
6(8).
- Abstract
In this paper a comparison between static and dynamic formulations of the Jiles-Atherton (JA) hysteresis model is presented. An assessment on the accuracy of core loss prediction and hysteretic loops reproduction of experimentally characterized on stator cores is performed. The novelty in this work is found in the optimized JA parameter datasets describing all the hysteresis loop measured for each of the considered excitation frequencies ranging between 25 and 800 Hz: BH loops with the same excitation frequency, having different maximum flux density values, are modeled using the same JA parameter set. The dynamic model is then compared to Bertotti’s model, and for laminated steel samples, it is better suited to estimate core losses at a... (More)
In this paper a comparison between static and dynamic formulations of the Jiles-Atherton (JA) hysteresis model is presented. An assessment on the accuracy of core loss prediction and hysteretic loops reproduction of experimentally characterized on stator cores is performed. The novelty in this work is found in the optimized JA parameter datasets describing all the hysteresis loop measured for each of the considered excitation frequencies ranging between 25 and 800 Hz: BH loops with the same excitation frequency, having different maximum flux density values, are modeled using the same JA parameter set. The dynamic model is then compared to Bertotti’s model, and for laminated steel samples, it is better suited to estimate core losses at a wide range of test points.
(Less)
- author
- Colombo, Leonardo
LU
; Reinap, Avo
LU
; Fyhr, Pontus
LU
and Alaküla, Mats
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2025
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Bertotti, Core losses, Dynamic Jiles-Atherton, Statis Jiles-Atherton, stator cores
- in
- IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
- volume
- 6
- issue
- 8
- article number
- 7300512
- publisher
- IEEE - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:105008773923
- ISSN
- 0018-9464
- DOI
- 10.1109/TMAG.2025.3581713
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- d09a0914-370f-4ce8-a68a-576d77c972f9
- date added to LUP
- 2025-06-30 16:24:47
- date last changed
- 2025-07-30 13:51:20
@article{d09a0914-370f-4ce8-a68a-576d77c972f9,
abstract = {{<p>In this paper a comparison between static and dynamic formulations of the Jiles-Atherton (JA) hysteresis model is presented. An assessment on the accuracy of core loss prediction and hysteretic loops reproduction of experimentally characterized on stator cores is performed. The novelty in this work is found in the optimized JA parameter datasets describing all the hysteresis loop measured for each of the considered excitation frequencies ranging between 25 and 800 Hz: BH loops with the same excitation frequency, having different maximum flux density values, are modeled using the same JA parameter set. The dynamic model is then compared to Bertotti’s model, and for laminated steel samples, it is better suited to estimate core losses at a wide range of test points.</p>}},
author = {{Colombo, Leonardo and Reinap, Avo and Fyhr, Pontus and Alaküla, Mats}},
issn = {{0018-9464}},
keywords = {{Bertotti; Core losses; Dynamic Jiles-Atherton; Statis Jiles-Atherton; stator cores}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{8}},
publisher = {{IEEE - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.}},
series = {{IEEE Transactions on Magnetics}},
title = {{Enhancing Core Loss Tracking Accuracy in Stator Cores : A Comparative Assessment of Static and Dynamic Jiles-Atherton Model Formulations}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2025.3581713}},
doi = {{10.1109/TMAG.2025.3581713}},
volume = {{6}},
year = {{2025}},
}