Five years of pharmaceutical industry funding of patient organisations in Sweden: cross-sectional study of companies, patient organisations and drugs
Mulinari, Shai LU ; Vilhelmsson, Andreas Joakim LU
; Rickard, Emily
and Ozieranski, Piotr
(2020)
In PLoS ONE
- Abstract
- Background
Many patient organisations collaborate with drug companies, resulting in concerns about commercial agendas influencing patient advocacy. We contribute to an international body of knowledge on patient organisation-industry relations by considering payments reported in the industry’s centralised ‘collaboration database’ in Sweden. We also investigate possible commercial motives behind the funding by assessing its association with drug commercialisation.
Methods
Our primary data source were 1,337 payment reports from 2014–2018. After extraction and coding, we analysed the data descriptively, calculating the number, value and distribution of payments for various units of analysis, e.g. individual... (More) - Background
Many patient organisations collaborate with drug companies, resulting in concerns about commercial agendas influencing patient advocacy. We contribute to an international body of knowledge on patient organisation-industry relations by considering payments reported in the industry’s centralised ‘collaboration database’ in Sweden. We also investigate possible commercial motives behind the funding by assessing its association with drug commercialisation.
Methods
Our primary data source were 1,337 payment reports from 2014–2018. After extraction and coding, we analysed the data descriptively, calculating the number, value and distribution of payments for various units of analysis, e.g. individual companies, diseases and payment goals. The association between drug commercialisation and patient organisation funding was assessed by, first, the concordance between leading companies marketing drugs in specific diseases and their funding of corresponding patient organisations and, second, the correlation between new drugs in broader condition areas and payments to corresponding patient organisations.
Results
46 companies reported paying €6,449.224 (median €2,411; IQR €1,024–4,569) to 77 patient organisations, but ten companies provided 67% of the funding. Small payments dominated, many of which covered costs of events organised by patient organisations. An association existed between drug commercialisation and industry funding. Companies supported patient organisations in diseases linked to their drug portfolios, with the top 3 condition areas in terms of funding–cancer; endocrine, nutritional and metabolic disorders; and infectious and parasitic disorders–accounting for 63% of new drugs and 56% of the funding.
Conclusion
This study reveals close and widespread ties between patient organisations and drug companies. A relatively few number of companies dominated the funding landscape by supporting patient organisations in disease areas linked to their drug portfolios. This commercially motivated funding may contribute to inequalities in resource and influence between patient organisations. The association between drug commercialisation and industry funding is also worrying because of the therapeutic uncertainty of many new drugs. Our analysis benefited from the existence of a centralised database of payments–which should be adopted by other countries too–but databases should be downloadable in an analysable format to permit efficient and independent analysis. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/d44a52bf-c1e7-49cf-8bd4-c0e34305258d
- author
- Mulinari, Shai
LU
; Vilhelmsson, Andreas Joakim
LU
; Rickard, Emily
and Ozieranski, Piotr
- organization
- publishing date
- 2020-06-24
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- PLoS ONE
- article number
- e.0235021
- publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85087099444
- pmid:32579571
- ISSN
- 1932-6203
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0235021
- project
- What can be learnt from the new pharmaceutical industry payment disclosures? A network and policy analysis of ties between companies and health professionals and organisations
- Ecology and governance of collaborations between patient organisations and the pharmaceutical industry in Sweden
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- d44a52bf-c1e7-49cf-8bd4-c0e34305258d
- date added to LUP
- 2020-06-20 17:26:51
- date last changed
- 2024-01-17 04:07:52
@article{d44a52bf-c1e7-49cf-8bd4-c0e34305258d,
abstract = {{Background<br/><br/>Many patient organisations collaborate with drug companies, resulting in concerns about commercial agendas influencing patient advocacy. We contribute to an international body of knowledge on patient organisation-industry relations by considering payments reported in the industry’s centralised ‘collaboration database’ in Sweden. We also investigate possible commercial motives behind the funding by assessing its association with drug commercialisation.<br/><br/>Methods<br/><br/>Our primary data source were 1,337 payment reports from 2014–2018. After extraction and coding, we analysed the data descriptively, calculating the number, value and distribution of payments for various units of analysis, e.g. individual companies, diseases and payment goals. The association between drug commercialisation and patient organisation funding was assessed by, first, the concordance between leading companies marketing drugs in specific diseases and their funding of corresponding patient organisations and, second, the correlation between new drugs in broader condition areas and payments to corresponding patient organisations.<br/><br/>Results<br/><br/>46 companies reported paying €6,449.224 (median €2,411; IQR €1,024–4,569) to 77 patient organisations, but ten companies provided 67% of the funding. Small payments dominated, many of which covered costs of events organised by patient organisations. An association existed between drug commercialisation and industry funding. Companies supported patient organisations in diseases linked to their drug portfolios, with the top 3 condition areas in terms of funding–cancer; endocrine, nutritional and metabolic disorders; and infectious and parasitic disorders–accounting for 63% of new drugs and 56% of the funding.<br/><br/>Conclusion<br/><br/>This study reveals close and widespread ties between patient organisations and drug companies. A relatively few number of companies dominated the funding landscape by supporting patient organisations in disease areas linked to their drug portfolios. This commercially motivated funding may contribute to inequalities in resource and influence between patient organisations. The association between drug commercialisation and industry funding is also worrying because of the therapeutic uncertainty of many new drugs. Our analysis benefited from the existence of a centralised database of payments–which should be adopted by other countries too–but databases should be downloadable in an analysable format to permit efficient and independent analysis.}},
author = {{Mulinari, Shai and Vilhelmsson, Andreas Joakim and Rickard, Emily and Ozieranski, Piotr}},
issn = {{1932-6203}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{06}},
publisher = {{Public Library of Science (PLoS)}},
series = {{PLoS ONE}},
title = {{Five years of pharmaceutical industry funding of patient organisations in Sweden: cross-sectional study of companies, patient organisations and drugs}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235021}},
doi = {{10.1371/journal.pone.0235021}},
year = {{2020}},
}