Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Further validation of the Chronic Pain Values Inventory in a Swedish chronic pain sample

Åkerblom, Sophia LU ; Perrin, Sean LU orcid ; Rivano, Marcelo LU and McCracken, Lance (2017) In Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 6(3). p.261-267
Abstract
Purpose

Value based action is an important process in the psychological flexibility model and is associated with daily functioning in people with chronic pain, but measures of it are not well-developed. The purpose of the present study was to examine the reliability and validity of a Swedish-language version of the Chronic Pain Values Inventory (CPVI) in a large sample of adults seeking treatment for chronic pain.
Material and methods

A Swedish version of the CPVI was created and administered alongside other measures of psychological flexibility and pain-related functioning in a convenience sample of 232 patients admitted for treatment at the Pain Rehabilitation Unit at Skåne University Hospital between February 2014... (More)
Purpose

Value based action is an important process in the psychological flexibility model and is associated with daily functioning in people with chronic pain, but measures of it are not well-developed. The purpose of the present study was to examine the reliability and validity of a Swedish-language version of the Chronic Pain Values Inventory (CPVI) in a large sample of adults seeking treatment for chronic pain.
Material and methods

A Swedish version of the CPVI was created and administered alongside other measures of psychological flexibility and pain-related functioning in a convenience sample of 232 patients admitted for treatment at the Pain Rehabilitation Unit at Skåne University Hospital between February 2014 and December 2015. Internal consistency of the CPVI was assessed as was its relationship to theoretically related facets from the psychological flexibility model. The utility of values-related processes in explaining variance in pain-related functioning was also examined by correlations and hierarchical regression analyses.
Results

Overall, this Swedish-language version of the CPVI was found to have satisfactory reliability and validity. The CPVI subscales yielded high levels of internal consistency. Evidence of construct validity in relation to other measures from the psychological flexibility model was observed as well as evidence of clinical utility in relation to measures of pain-related functioning.
Discussion

This brief self-report measure of values-based action seems to yield valid data in Swedish adults suffering from chronic pain. Values based processes appear important within evidence-based treatments for chronic pain, especially Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and the CPVI may help assess these, particularly in predictor studies of pain-related functioning and analyses of therapeutic change processes or mechanisms. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Chronic Pain, Psychological Flexibility, Values Based Action, validation study
in
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
volume
6
issue
3
pages
261 - 267
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:85021124102
ISSN
2212-1447
DOI
10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.06.001
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
dc200cc9-9b14-4889-8cdc-29e380db057d
date added to LUP
2016-11-10 19:11:31
date last changed
2022-02-21 21:49:32
@article{dc200cc9-9b14-4889-8cdc-29e380db057d,
  abstract     = {{Purpose<br/><br/>Value based action is an important process in the psychological flexibility model and is associated with daily functioning in people with chronic pain, but measures of it are not well-developed. The purpose of the present study was to examine the reliability and validity of a Swedish-language version of the Chronic Pain Values Inventory (CPVI) in a large sample of adults seeking treatment for chronic pain.<br/>Material and methods<br/><br/>A Swedish version of the CPVI was created and administered alongside other measures of psychological flexibility and pain-related functioning in a convenience sample of 232 patients admitted for treatment at the Pain Rehabilitation Unit at Skåne University Hospital between February 2014 and December 2015. Internal consistency of the CPVI was assessed as was its relationship to theoretically related facets from the psychological flexibility model. The utility of values-related processes in explaining variance in pain-related functioning was also examined by correlations and hierarchical regression analyses.<br/>Results<br/><br/>Overall, this Swedish-language version of the CPVI was found to have satisfactory reliability and validity. The CPVI subscales yielded high levels of internal consistency. Evidence of construct validity in relation to other measures from the psychological flexibility model was observed as well as evidence of clinical utility in relation to measures of pain-related functioning.<br/>Discussion<br/><br/>This brief self-report measure of values-based action seems to yield valid data in Swedish adults suffering from chronic pain. Values based processes appear important within evidence-based treatments for chronic pain, especially Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and the CPVI may help assess these, particularly in predictor studies of pain-related functioning and analyses of therapeutic change processes or mechanisms.}},
  author       = {{Åkerblom, Sophia and Perrin, Sean and Rivano, Marcelo and McCracken, Lance}},
  issn         = {{2212-1447}},
  keywords     = {{Chronic Pain; Psychological Flexibility; Values Based Action; validation study}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{06}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{261--267}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science}},
  title        = {{Further validation of the Chronic Pain Values Inventory in a Swedish chronic pain sample}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.06.001}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.06.001}},
  volume       = {{6}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}