Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Medical Record Review Methodology for Assessing Child and Adolescent Depression Healthcare Quality : A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis

Remvall, Susanne LU orcid ; Jarbin, Håkan LU and Hofvander, Björn LU orcid (2026) In Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Abstract

Background Early-onset depression contributes significantly to long-term disability and suicide, making high-quality healthcare for young people with depression a critical concern. Medical record review (MRR) is widely used to assess healthcare quality. However, its application to depression care for children and adolescents appears underexplored, with no consensus on conceptualising or measuring quality. This systematic review aimed to evaluate how quality was operationalised in primary studies using MRR in this context.MethodsA structured search in PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycInfo following PRISMA guidelines identified 1,690 unique articles. Studies using MRR to evaluate outpatient depression healthcare quality for patients ≤17 years were... (More)

Background Early-onset depression contributes significantly to long-term disability and suicide, making high-quality healthcare for young people with depression a critical concern. Medical record review (MRR) is widely used to assess healthcare quality. However, its application to depression care for children and adolescents appears underexplored, with no consensus on conceptualising or measuring quality. This systematic review aimed to evaluate how quality was operationalised in primary studies using MRR in this context.MethodsA structured search in PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycInfo following PRISMA guidelines identified 1,690 unique articles. Studies using MRR to evaluate outpatient depression healthcare quality for patients ≤17 years were included. Thematic synthesis was applied, focusing on methods, indicator themes, and quality framework alignment.ResultsSix studies published in 2005–2022 were included. These used 3–32 indicators covering risk assessments, diagnostic assessment, treatment, and monitoring, but indicators and operationalisation methods varied widely. Two studies reported using consensus methods. None incorporated the Institute of Medicine or World Health Organization quality frameworks. Binary opportunity indicator assessments were standard, but methods for deriving composite measures differed.ConclusionsDespite shared themes, heterogeneity and lack of framework alignment limit comparability. Robust operationalisation methods ensuring indicator reliability and validity would strengthen future measurement of depression healthcare quality.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
epub
subject
keywords
adolescent, care, chart, child, depression, healthcare, indicator, quality, record, review
in
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
publisher
SAGE Publications
external identifiers
  • pmid:41906942
  • scopus:105034672848
ISSN
1359-1045
DOI
10.1177/13591045261427558
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
e1d8bbbf-67ca-40c7-8fed-95bb028b9ebf
date added to LUP
2026-05-13 11:30:50
date last changed
2026-05-27 12:25:25
@article{e1d8bbbf-67ca-40c7-8fed-95bb028b9ebf,
  abstract     = {{<p>Background Early-onset depression contributes significantly to long-term disability and suicide, making high-quality healthcare for young people with depression a critical concern. Medical record review (MRR) is widely used to assess healthcare quality. However, its application to depression care for children and adolescents appears underexplored, with no consensus on conceptualising or measuring quality. This systematic review aimed to evaluate how quality was operationalised in primary studies using MRR in this context.MethodsA structured search in PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycInfo following PRISMA guidelines identified 1,690 unique articles. Studies using MRR to evaluate outpatient depression healthcare quality for patients ≤17 years were included. Thematic synthesis was applied, focusing on methods, indicator themes, and quality framework alignment.ResultsSix studies published in 2005–2022 were included. These used 3–32 indicators covering risk assessments, diagnostic assessment, treatment, and monitoring, but indicators and operationalisation methods varied widely. Two studies reported using consensus methods. None incorporated the Institute of Medicine or World Health Organization quality frameworks. Binary opportunity indicator assessments were standard, but methods for deriving composite measures differed.ConclusionsDespite shared themes, heterogeneity and lack of framework alignment limit comparability. Robust operationalisation methods ensuring indicator reliability and validity would strengthen future measurement of depression healthcare quality.</p>}},
  author       = {{Remvall, Susanne and Jarbin, Håkan and Hofvander, Björn}},
  issn         = {{1359-1045}},
  keywords     = {{adolescent; care; chart; child; depression; healthcare; indicator; quality; record; review}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  series       = {{Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry}},
  title        = {{Medical Record Review Methodology for Assessing Child and Adolescent Depression Healthcare Quality : A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13591045261427558}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/13591045261427558}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}