Managing choice uncertainties in life-cycle assessment as a decision-support tool for building design : A case study on building framework
(2020) In Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(12).- Abstract
To establish a circular economy in society, it is crucial to incorporate life-cycle studies, such as life-cycle assessment (LCA), in the design process of products in order to mitigate the well-recognized problem of the design paradox. The aim of the study was to provide means in a structured way to highlight choice uncertainty present in LCA when used as decision support, as well as to mitigate subjective interpretations of the numerical results leading to arbitrary decisions. The study focused on choices available when defining the goal and scope of a life-cycle assessment. The suggested approach is intended to be used in the early design phases of complex products with high levels of uncertainty in the product life-cycle. To... (More)
To establish a circular economy in society, it is crucial to incorporate life-cycle studies, such as life-cycle assessment (LCA), in the design process of products in order to mitigate the well-recognized problem of the design paradox. The aim of the study was to provide means in a structured way to highlight choice uncertainty present in LCA when used as decision support, as well as to mitigate subjective interpretations of the numerical results leading to arbitrary decisions. The study focused on choices available when defining the goal and scope of a life-cycle assessment. The suggested approach is intended to be used in the early design phases of complex products with high levels of uncertainty in the product life-cycle. To demonstrate and evaluate the approach, a life-cycle assessment was conducted of two design options for a specific building. In the case study two types of building frameworks were compared from an environmental perspective by calculating the global warming potential, eutrophication potential, acidification potential, stratospheric ozone depletion potential and photochemical oxidants creation potential. In the study, a procedure named the Decision Choices Procedure (DCP) was developed to improve LCA as an effective tool for decision support concerning design alternatives when less information is available. The advantages and drawbacks of the proposed approach are discussed to spur further improvements in the use of LCA as a decision-support tool.
(Less)
- author
- Ylmén, Peter LU ; Berlin, Johanna ; Mjörnell, Kristina LU and Arfvidsson, Jesper LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2020
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Building, Choice, Decision choice procedure, Design, LCA, Life-cycle, Method, Uncertainties
- in
- Sustainability (Switzerland)
- volume
- 12
- issue
- 12
- article number
- 5130
- publisher
- MDPI AG
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85086914125
- ISSN
- 2071-1050
- DOI
- 10.3390/su12125130
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- e6b7a489-2825-4198-b184-0f65c27eb156
- date added to LUP
- 2020-07-08 11:49:37
- date last changed
- 2022-04-18 23:25:54
@article{e6b7a489-2825-4198-b184-0f65c27eb156,
abstract = {{<p>To establish a circular economy in society, it is crucial to incorporate life-cycle studies, such as life-cycle assessment (LCA), in the design process of products in order to mitigate the well-recognized problem of the design paradox. The aim of the study was to provide means in a structured way to highlight choice uncertainty present in LCA when used as decision support, as well as to mitigate subjective interpretations of the numerical results leading to arbitrary decisions. The study focused on choices available when defining the goal and scope of a life-cycle assessment. The suggested approach is intended to be used in the early design phases of complex products with high levels of uncertainty in the product life-cycle. To demonstrate and evaluate the approach, a life-cycle assessment was conducted of two design options for a specific building. In the case study two types of building frameworks were compared from an environmental perspective by calculating the global warming potential, eutrophication potential, acidification potential, stratospheric ozone depletion potential and photochemical oxidants creation potential. In the study, a procedure named the Decision Choices Procedure (DCP) was developed to improve LCA as an effective tool for decision support concerning design alternatives when less information is available. The advantages and drawbacks of the proposed approach are discussed to spur further improvements in the use of LCA as a decision-support tool.</p>}},
author = {{Ylmén, Peter and Berlin, Johanna and Mjörnell, Kristina and Arfvidsson, Jesper}},
issn = {{2071-1050}},
keywords = {{Building; Choice; Decision choice procedure; Design; LCA; Life-cycle; Method; Uncertainties}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{12}},
publisher = {{MDPI AG}},
series = {{Sustainability (Switzerland)}},
title = {{Managing choice uncertainties in life-cycle assessment as a decision-support tool for building design : A case study on building framework}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12125130}},
doi = {{10.3390/su12125130}},
volume = {{12}},
year = {{2020}},
}