Extravert Surgical Resident Applicants Get Higher 360-Degree Evaluations From Coworkers
(2024) In The Journal of surgical research 298. p.193-200- Abstract
INTRODUCTION: 360-degree evaluations are used as an assessment in order to identify strengths and weaknesses of, or as a continuous evaluation for, residents. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between personality and ratings on 360-degree evaluations among surgical residency applicants. A secondary aim was to describe the personality profile of applicants for a surgical residency position.
METHODS: Doctors interviewed for a residency or locum position in general, urology, or pediatric surgery were included. Participants rated their personality on the Neutralized Big Five Inventory. A 360-degree assessment was conducted. Scores from two laparoscopic simulators were used as a measure of technical ability.... (More)
INTRODUCTION: 360-degree evaluations are used as an assessment in order to identify strengths and weaknesses of, or as a continuous evaluation for, residents. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between personality and ratings on 360-degree evaluations among surgical residency applicants. A secondary aim was to describe the personality profile of applicants for a surgical residency position.
METHODS: Doctors interviewed for a residency or locum position in general, urology, or pediatric surgery were included. Participants rated their personality on the Neutralized Big Five Inventory. A 360-degree assessment was conducted. Scores from two laparoscopic simulators were used as a measure of technical ability. Univariate analyses were used to assess the results. Student's t-test was used to compare personality and Pearson correlations between 360-degree assessment and personality.
RESULTS: Fifty doctors participated: data were complete for 38. Personality profiles showed higher emotional stability, agreeableness, conscientiousness and openness ratings than the norm. Correlations revealed a significant relationship between extraversion and higher scores on the 360-degree assessments. Significant univariate correlations were found between extraversion and the 360-degree assessments, and two of the correlations held up after adjustment for multiple tests. No correlations with performance when using laparoscopic simulators were found.
CONCLUSIONS: Applicants for surgical residency rated significantly higher than the norm in four personality domains. Extraversion correlated with overall higher scores in 360-degree assessments by coworkers. Higher scores were not related to objective measures of technical skill, highlighting the importance of using objective measures for assessment.
(Less)
- author
- Pedersen, Hanne
LU
; Bäckström, Martin LU and Hagelsteen, Kristine LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2024-06
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Humans, Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data, Male, Female, Adult, Personality, Extraversion, Psychological, General Surgery/education, Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data, Laparoscopy/education
- in
- The Journal of surgical research
- volume
- 298
- pages
- 193 - 200
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85190294704
- pmid:38626716
- ISSN
- 1095-8673
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jss.2024.03.016
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- id
- f097bffd-897e-4b3c-8b3d-b76ec680f555
- date added to LUP
- 2024-11-05 09:55:53
- date last changed
- 2025-06-18 23:07:17
@article{f097bffd-897e-4b3c-8b3d-b76ec680f555, abstract = {{<p>INTRODUCTION: 360-degree evaluations are used as an assessment in order to identify strengths and weaknesses of, or as a continuous evaluation for, residents. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between personality and ratings on 360-degree evaluations among surgical residency applicants. A secondary aim was to describe the personality profile of applicants for a surgical residency position.</p><p>METHODS: Doctors interviewed for a residency or locum position in general, urology, or pediatric surgery were included. Participants rated their personality on the Neutralized Big Five Inventory. A 360-degree assessment was conducted. Scores from two laparoscopic simulators were used as a measure of technical ability. Univariate analyses were used to assess the results. Student's t-test was used to compare personality and Pearson correlations between 360-degree assessment and personality.</p><p>RESULTS: Fifty doctors participated: data were complete for 38. Personality profiles showed higher emotional stability, agreeableness, conscientiousness and openness ratings than the norm. Correlations revealed a significant relationship between extraversion and higher scores on the 360-degree assessments. Significant univariate correlations were found between extraversion and the 360-degree assessments, and two of the correlations held up after adjustment for multiple tests. No correlations with performance when using laparoscopic simulators were found.</p><p>CONCLUSIONS: Applicants for surgical residency rated significantly higher than the norm in four personality domains. Extraversion correlated with overall higher scores in 360-degree assessments by coworkers. Higher scores were not related to objective measures of technical skill, highlighting the importance of using objective measures for assessment.</p>}}, author = {{Pedersen, Hanne and Bäckström, Martin and Hagelsteen, Kristine}}, issn = {{1095-8673}}, keywords = {{Humans; Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data; Male; Female; Adult; Personality; Extraversion, Psychological; General Surgery/education; Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data; Laparoscopy/education}}, language = {{eng}}, pages = {{193--200}}, publisher = {{Elsevier}}, series = {{The Journal of surgical research}}, title = {{Extravert Surgical Resident Applicants Get Higher 360-Degree Evaluations From Coworkers}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.03.016}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.jss.2024.03.016}}, volume = {{298}}, year = {{2024}}, }