Compliance with preparedness and early evacuation guidelines : An analysis of responsibility, disaster literacy, and situated agency in an Australian bushfire
(2026) In Fire Safety Journal 162.- Abstract
This article examines community resilience through a case study of a community in Australia affected by bushfire in 2024. Drawing on 28 interviews with residents, we analyze preparedness practices and response decisions. In Victoria, Australia, where the community is situated, residents of fire-prone areas receive recommendations concerning preparedness and response from the Country Fire Authority (CFA). Resident interviews explore the extent to which individuals adhere to the guidance provided. The findings reveal both compliance with and divergence from official recommendations. Residents actively engaged in practical, strategic, and relational preparedness measures, yet did not follow guidance to evacuate early during the response... (More)
This article examines community resilience through a case study of a community in Australia affected by bushfire in 2024. Drawing on 28 interviews with residents, we analyze preparedness practices and response decisions. In Victoria, Australia, where the community is situated, residents of fire-prone areas receive recommendations concerning preparedness and response from the Country Fire Authority (CFA). Resident interviews explore the extent to which individuals adhere to the guidance provided. The findings reveal both compliance with and divergence from official recommendations. Residents actively engaged in practical, strategic, and relational preparedness measures, yet did not follow guidance to evacuate early during the response phase. Instead, the residents’ response was shaped by evolving personal risk assessments based on the triangulation of available information. While guidelines and warnings were taken seriously, they were integrated into locally grounded processes of decision-making. The study argues that noncompliance reflects the evaluation of situated agency supported by disaster literacy. Reframing preparedness and response expectations to account for variability and adaptive strategies can strengthen the effectiveness of disaster risk management. The findings underscore the importance of enhancing disaster literacy and developing frameworks that balance institutional guidance with community situated agency, thereby promoting more realistic expectations and pathways to resilience.
(Less)
- author
- Hovart, Lucas D. LU ; Morrison, Rosie ; Kuligowski, Erica D. ; Frykmer, Tove LU and McNamee, Margaret LU
- organization
-
- Division of Fire Safety Engineering
- Division of Risk Management and Societal Safety
- Centre for preparedness and resilience (LUPREP)
- LTH Profile Area: Food and Bio
- Faculty of Engineering, LTH
- LTH Profile Area: The Energy Transition
- LTH Profile Area: Circular Building Sector
- LTH Profile Area: Aerosols
- v1000000
- publishing date
- 2026-07
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Bushfires, Disaster literacy, Egress, Hazard evaluation, Human factors, Response patterns, Risk assessment, Wildfires, WUI
- in
- Fire Safety Journal
- volume
- 162
- article number
- 104796
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:105034307439
- ISSN
- 0379-7112
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.firesaf.2026.104796
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- Publisher Copyright: © 2026 The Authors.
- id
- f0d5ceb6-bcde-4d3a-9957-140d48f89b04
- date added to LUP
- 2026-05-26 15:26:40
- date last changed
- 2026-05-26 15:27:43
@article{f0d5ceb6-bcde-4d3a-9957-140d48f89b04,
abstract = {{<p>This article examines community resilience through a case study of a community in Australia affected by bushfire in 2024. Drawing on 28 interviews with residents, we analyze preparedness practices and response decisions. In Victoria, Australia, where the community is situated, residents of fire-prone areas receive recommendations concerning preparedness and response from the Country Fire Authority (CFA). Resident interviews explore the extent to which individuals adhere to the guidance provided. The findings reveal both compliance with and divergence from official recommendations. Residents actively engaged in practical, strategic, and relational preparedness measures, yet did not follow guidance to evacuate early during the response phase. Instead, the residents’ response was shaped by evolving personal risk assessments based on the triangulation of available information. While guidelines and warnings were taken seriously, they were integrated into locally grounded processes of decision-making. The study argues that noncompliance reflects the evaluation of situated agency supported by disaster literacy. Reframing preparedness and response expectations to account for variability and adaptive strategies can strengthen the effectiveness of disaster risk management. The findings underscore the importance of enhancing disaster literacy and developing frameworks that balance institutional guidance with community situated agency, thereby promoting more realistic expectations and pathways to resilience.</p>}},
author = {{Hovart, Lucas D. and Morrison, Rosie and Kuligowski, Erica D. and Frykmer, Tove and McNamee, Margaret}},
issn = {{0379-7112}},
keywords = {{Bushfires; Disaster literacy; Egress; Hazard evaluation; Human factors; Response patterns; Risk assessment; Wildfires; WUI}},
language = {{eng}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Fire Safety Journal}},
title = {{Compliance with preparedness and early evacuation guidelines : An analysis of responsibility, disaster literacy, and situated agency in an Australian bushfire}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2026.104796}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.firesaf.2026.104796}},
volume = {{162}},
year = {{2026}},
}