Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Why not vaginal?—Nationwide trends and surgical outcomes in low-risk hysterectomies : A retrospective cohort study

Wagenius, Johanna LU ; Ehrström, Sophia ; Källén, Karin LU ; Baekelandt, Jan LU and Stuart, Andrea LU (2025) In Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 104(5). p.958-967
Abstract

Introduction: The rate of vaginal hysterectomies is declining globally. We investigated surgical techniques, outcomes, and costs in a large national cohort of benign hysterectomies with prerequisites for vaginal surgery. Material and Methods: A retrospective register-based cohort study with benign hysterectomies in the Swedish GynOp registry 2014–2023 (n = 17 804). Inclusion criteria were non-prolapse, non-endometriosis with uterus weight <300 g. The cohort was divided into a low-risk and a standard group, with the low-risk group having optimal conditions for vaginal hysterectomy: no previous caesarian section (CS), no previous abdominal surgery, Body Mass Index (BMI) <30, and no nulliparous patients. Surgical outcomes were... (More)

Introduction: The rate of vaginal hysterectomies is declining globally. We investigated surgical techniques, outcomes, and costs in a large national cohort of benign hysterectomies with prerequisites for vaginal surgery. Material and Methods: A retrospective register-based cohort study with benign hysterectomies in the Swedish GynOp registry 2014–2023 (n = 17 804). Inclusion criteria were non-prolapse, non-endometriosis with uterus weight <300 g. The cohort was divided into a low-risk and a standard group, with the low-risk group having optimal conditions for vaginal hysterectomy: no previous caesarian section (CS), no previous abdominal surgery, Body Mass Index (BMI) <30, and no nulliparous patients. Surgical outcomes were quantified using crude and adjusted risk ratios (RR, ARR). Costs were calculated and compared between abdominal (AH), laparoscopic (LH), robot-assisted (RH), and vaginal hysterectomies (VH). Results: The rate of AH and VH decreased during the period studied. RH increased and was the most common surgical technique 2021–2023 (33.2%). VH had the shortest surgical time and was the cheapest method. In the low-risk group, 25.2% of the patients were operated on vaginally. AH had more postoperative complications and longer hospitalization compared to VH in the low-risk group. LH had less severe intraoperative complications, ARR = 0.38 (95% CI 0.17–0.86) but more mild postoperative complications, ARR = 1.24 (95% CI 1.05–1.46) compared to VH in the low-risk group. LH had more conversions, ARR = 1.46 (95% CI 1.00–2.12), longer surgical time, ARR = 2.73 (95% CI 2.46–3.00) and longer hospital stay, ARR = 1.26 (95% CI 1.12–1.43) compared to VH. Mild (ARR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.16–0.66) and severe (ARR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.05–0.58) intraoperative complications and bleeding >500 mL (ARR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.04–0.34) were less common in RH versus VH in the low-risk group. There were no differences between RH and VH regarding postoperative complications and reoperations. Surgical time <45 min was less common in RH versus VH (ARR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.42–0.54) and RH had a significantly longer postoperative hospital stay (ARR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.02–1.33). Conclusions: A decline of vaginal hysterectomies in Sweden 2014–2023 among patients with prerequisites for vaginal surgery was shown. VH was the cheapest method with few postoperative complications and short hospitalization. Our results support the vaginal route in low-risk hysterectomies.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
complications, cost, minimally invasive surgery, surgical outcome, vaginal hysterectomy
in
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
volume
104
issue
5
pages
10 pages
publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
external identifiers
  • scopus:105000830014
  • pmid:40103339
ISSN
0001-6349
DOI
10.1111/aogs.15099
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
f7c46784-0884-4561-ae2a-46dd126008d0
date added to LUP
2025-08-08 12:28:28
date last changed
2025-08-09 03:00:05
@article{f7c46784-0884-4561-ae2a-46dd126008d0,
  abstract     = {{<p>Introduction: The rate of vaginal hysterectomies is declining globally. We investigated surgical techniques, outcomes, and costs in a large national cohort of benign hysterectomies with prerequisites for vaginal surgery. Material and Methods: A retrospective register-based cohort study with benign hysterectomies in the Swedish GynOp registry 2014–2023 (n = 17 804). Inclusion criteria were non-prolapse, non-endometriosis with uterus weight &lt;300 g. The cohort was divided into a low-risk and a standard group, with the low-risk group having optimal conditions for vaginal hysterectomy: no previous caesarian section (CS), no previous abdominal surgery, Body Mass Index (BMI) &lt;30, and no nulliparous patients. Surgical outcomes were quantified using crude and adjusted risk ratios (RR, ARR). Costs were calculated and compared between abdominal (AH), laparoscopic (LH), robot-assisted (RH), and vaginal hysterectomies (VH). Results: The rate of AH and VH decreased during the period studied. RH increased and was the most common surgical technique 2021–2023 (33.2%). VH had the shortest surgical time and was the cheapest method. In the low-risk group, 25.2% of the patients were operated on vaginally. AH had more postoperative complications and longer hospitalization compared to VH in the low-risk group. LH had less severe intraoperative complications, ARR = 0.38 (95% CI 0.17–0.86) but more mild postoperative complications, ARR = 1.24 (95% CI 1.05–1.46) compared to VH in the low-risk group. LH had more conversions, ARR = 1.46 (95% CI 1.00–2.12), longer surgical time, ARR = 2.73 (95% CI 2.46–3.00) and longer hospital stay, ARR = 1.26 (95% CI 1.12–1.43) compared to VH. Mild (ARR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.16–0.66) and severe (ARR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.05–0.58) intraoperative complications and bleeding &gt;500 mL (ARR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.04–0.34) were less common in RH versus VH in the low-risk group. There were no differences between RH and VH regarding postoperative complications and reoperations. Surgical time &lt;45 min was less common in RH versus VH (ARR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.42–0.54) and RH had a significantly longer postoperative hospital stay (ARR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.02–1.33). Conclusions: A decline of vaginal hysterectomies in Sweden 2014–2023 among patients with prerequisites for vaginal surgery was shown. VH was the cheapest method with few postoperative complications and short hospitalization. Our results support the vaginal route in low-risk hysterectomies.</p>}},
  author       = {{Wagenius, Johanna and Ehrström, Sophia and Källén, Karin and Baekelandt, Jan and Stuart, Andrea}},
  issn         = {{0001-6349}},
  keywords     = {{complications; cost; minimally invasive surgery; surgical outcome; vaginal hysterectomy}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{958--967}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley-Blackwell}},
  series       = {{Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica}},
  title        = {{Why not vaginal?—Nationwide trends and surgical outcomes in low-risk hysterectomies : A retrospective cohort study}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15099}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/aogs.15099}},
  volume       = {{104}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}