Un interval poetic
(2018) In Steaua 10(840). p.34-35- Abstract
- There are directions of interpretation with which some researchers may disagree. But it would be difficult for someone to point to rigidities, idiosyncracies or dangerous arguments. In fact, the demonstrations of Ion Pop meet the conditions for verifying the degree of science stated by an epistemologist such as Karl Popper. Any hypothesis has to be checked but also contradicted. Any theoretical ensemble should not be imagined perfectly and undeniably. The modest demand in this book of literary history is that
neo-modernism should no longer be dispatched simplistically, on the grounds that it would conclude, anachronistically, a poetic paradigm exhausted in the interwar period. Without questioning the importance of postmodernists, Ion... (More) - There are directions of interpretation with which some researchers may disagree. But it would be difficult for someone to point to rigidities, idiosyncracies or dangerous arguments. In fact, the demonstrations of Ion Pop meet the conditions for verifying the degree of science stated by an epistemologist such as Karl Popper. Any hypothesis has to be checked but also contradicted. Any theoretical ensemble should not be imagined perfectly and undeniably. The modest demand in this book of literary history is that
neo-modernism should no longer be dispatched simplistically, on the grounds that it would conclude, anachronistically, a poetic paradigm exhausted in the interwar period. Without questioning the importance of postmodernists, Ion Pop studies under the microscope the proximity of modernism, neo-modernism, and subsequently which he confirms or builds new bridges to further developments. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/3586c26a-7c38-49eb-ab2f-1df803f5759e
- author
- Nicolau, Felix LU
- organization
- alternative title
- A poetic interval
- publishing date
- 2018-10-06
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- neomodernist literature, postmodernism, epistemology and literature, Romanian Literature, Languages and Literature studies (specific languages)
- in
- Steaua
- volume
- 10
- issue
- 840
- article number
- 11
- pages
- 2 pages
- ISSN
- 0039-0852
- language
- Romanian
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 3586c26a-7c38-49eb-ab2f-1df803f5759e
- date added to LUP
- 2019-05-31 22:14:40
- date last changed
- 2019-07-01 12:18:33
@misc{3586c26a-7c38-49eb-ab2f-1df803f5759e, abstract = {{There are directions of interpretation with which some researchers may disagree. But it would be difficult for someone to point to rigidities, idiosyncracies or dangerous arguments. In fact, the demonstrations of Ion Pop meet the conditions for verifying the degree of science stated by an epistemologist such as Karl Popper. Any hypothesis has to be checked but also contradicted. Any theoretical ensemble should not be imagined perfectly and undeniably. The modest demand in this book of literary history is that<br/>neo-modernism should no longer be dispatched simplistically, on the grounds that it would conclude, anachronistically, a poetic paradigm exhausted in the interwar period. Without questioning the importance of postmodernists, Ion Pop studies under the microscope the proximity of modernism, neo-modernism, and subsequently which he confirms or builds new bridges to further developments.}}, author = {{Nicolau, Felix}}, issn = {{0039-0852}}, keywords = {{neomodernist literature; postmodernism; epistemology and literature; Romanian Literature; Languages and Literature studies (specific languages)}}, language = {{rum}}, month = {{10}}, note = {{Review}}, number = {{840}}, pages = {{34--35}}, series = {{Steaua}}, title = {{Un interval poetic}}, url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/65285876/Steaua_nr_10_din_2018_1_.pdf}}, volume = {{10}}, year = {{2018}}, }