Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Searching with and against each other : Spatiotemporal coordination of visual search behavior in collaborative and competitive settings

Niehorster, Diederick C LU orcid ; Cornelissen, Tim ; Holmqvist, Kenneth and Hooge, Ignace (2019) In Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 81(3). p.666-683
Abstract

Although in real life people frequently perform visual search together, in lab experiments this social dimension is typically left out. Here, we investigate individual, collaborative and competitive visual search with visualization of search partners' gaze. Participants were instructed to search a grid of Gabor patches while being eye tracked. For collaboration and competition, searchers were shown in real time at which element the paired searcher was looking. To promote collaboration or competition, points were rewarded or deducted for correct or incorrect answers. Early in collaboration trials, searchers rarely fixated the same elements. Reaction times of couples were roughly halved compared with individual search, although error... (More)

Although in real life people frequently perform visual search together, in lab experiments this social dimension is typically left out. Here, we investigate individual, collaborative and competitive visual search with visualization of search partners' gaze. Participants were instructed to search a grid of Gabor patches while being eye tracked. For collaboration and competition, searchers were shown in real time at which element the paired searcher was looking. To promote collaboration or competition, points were rewarded or deducted for correct or incorrect answers. Early in collaboration trials, searchers rarely fixated the same elements. Reaction times of couples were roughly halved compared with individual search, although error rates did not increase. This indicates searchers formed an efficient collaboration strategy. Overlap, the proportion of dwells that landed on hexagons that the other searcher had already looked at, was lower than expected from simulated overlap of two searchers who are blind to the behavior of their partner. The proportion of overlapping dwells correlated positively with ratings of the quality of collaboration. During competition, overlap increased earlier in time, indicating that competitors divided space less efficiently. Analysis of the entropy of the dwell locations and scan paths revealed that in the competition condition, a less fixed looking pattern was exhibited than in the collaborate and individual search conditions. We conclude that participants can efficiently search together when provided only with information about their partner's gaze position by dividing up the search space. Competing search exhibited more random gaze patterns, potentially reflecting increased interaction between searchers in this condition.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Visual search, Shared gaze, Collaboration, Competition, Eye movements
in
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
volume
81
issue
3
pages
666 - 683
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • scopus:85059297544
  • pmid:30593653
ISSN
1943-3921
DOI
10.3758/s13414-018-01640-0
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
6968cc6e-3639-4f65-a249-ef4103fd0a8a
date added to LUP
2019-01-01 11:46:11
date last changed
2024-04-01 17:23:22
@article{6968cc6e-3639-4f65-a249-ef4103fd0a8a,
  abstract     = {{<p>Although in real life people frequently perform visual search together, in lab experiments this social dimension is typically left out. Here, we investigate individual, collaborative and competitive visual search with visualization of search partners' gaze. Participants were instructed to search a grid of Gabor patches while being eye tracked. For collaboration and competition, searchers were shown in real time at which element the paired searcher was looking. To promote collaboration or competition, points were rewarded or deducted for correct or incorrect answers. Early in collaboration trials, searchers rarely fixated the same elements. Reaction times of couples were roughly halved compared with individual search, although error rates did not increase. This indicates searchers formed an efficient collaboration strategy. Overlap, the proportion of dwells that landed on hexagons that the other searcher had already looked at, was lower than expected from simulated overlap of two searchers who are blind to the behavior of their partner. The proportion of overlapping dwells correlated positively with ratings of the quality of collaboration. During competition, overlap increased earlier in time, indicating that competitors divided space less efficiently. Analysis of the entropy of the dwell locations and scan paths revealed that in the competition condition, a less fixed looking pattern was exhibited than in the collaborate and individual search conditions. We conclude that participants can efficiently search together when provided only with information about their partner's gaze position by dividing up the search space. Competing search exhibited more random gaze patterns, potentially reflecting increased interaction between searchers in this condition.</p>}},
  author       = {{Niehorster, Diederick C and Cornelissen, Tim and Holmqvist, Kenneth and Hooge, Ignace}},
  issn         = {{1943-3921}},
  keywords     = {{Visual search; Shared gaze; Collaboration; Competition; Eye movements}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{666--683}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  series       = {{Attention, Perception & Psychophysics}},
  title        = {{Searching with and against each other : Spatiotemporal coordination of visual search behavior in collaborative and competitive settings}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-01640-0}},
  doi          = {{10.3758/s13414-018-01640-0}},
  volume       = {{81}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}