Viața de noapte a doctoratului
(2019) In Laudatio 1(1). p.34-35- Abstract
- The current procedure of doctoral itinerary does not leave many choices to the doctoral supervisor: Once admitted, the doctoral student is required to defend three reports that are not graded in any way, and the commission can only offer some recommendations. The PhD supervisor cannot reject the report before supporting it. Everything is more a formality. Understanding this, many PhD students do not respond to the doctoral supervisor's requests constantly, but only when they have some goodwill. The doctoral supervisor can only react when the time arrives for the defence of the whole thesis. In this way, the PhD candidate can end up blocked after three years' work of suspicious success. In this way, the thesis maynot receive aapproval for... (More)
- The current procedure of doctoral itinerary does not leave many choices to the doctoral supervisor: Once admitted, the doctoral student is required to defend three reports that are not graded in any way, and the commission can only offer some recommendations. The PhD supervisor cannot reject the report before supporting it. Everything is more a formality. Understanding this, many PhD students do not respond to the doctoral supervisor's requests constantly, but only when they have some goodwill. The doctoral supervisor can only react when the time arrives for the defence of the whole thesis. In this way, the PhD candidate can end up blocked after three years' work of suspicious success. In this way, the thesis maynot receive aapproval for being defended. This is why many scientific conflicts are conducive to weird court cases. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/3097155c-f6e9-48ba-b937-9b1a088ae411
- author
- Nicolau, Felix LU
- organization
- alternative title
- The night life of doctoral studies
- publishing date
- 2019-01-12
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Doctorates, examination, Pedagogy, Legal cases, philology
- in
- Laudatio
- volume
- 1
- issue
- 1
- article number
- 8
- pages
- 34 - 35
- ISSN
- 2602-1900
- language
- Romanian
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 3097155c-f6e9-48ba-b937-9b1a088ae411
- alternative location
- https://laudatio.ro/viata-de-noapte-a-doctoratului/
- date added to LUP
- 2019-05-27 20:47:52
- date last changed
- 2019-07-19 09:18:45
@misc{3097155c-f6e9-48ba-b937-9b1a088ae411, abstract = {{The current procedure of doctoral itinerary does not leave many choices to the doctoral supervisor: Once admitted, the doctoral student is required to defend three reports that are not graded in any way, and the commission can only offer some recommendations. The PhD supervisor cannot reject the report before supporting it. Everything is more a formality. Understanding this, many PhD students do not respond to the doctoral supervisor's requests constantly, but only when they have some goodwill. The doctoral supervisor can only react when the time arrives for the defence of the whole thesis. In this way, the PhD candidate can end up blocked after three years' work of suspicious success. In this way, the thesis maynot receive aapproval for being defended. This is why many scientific conflicts are conducive to weird court cases.}}, author = {{Nicolau, Felix}}, issn = {{2602-1900}}, keywords = {{Doctorates; examination; Pedagogy; Legal cases; philology}}, language = {{rum}}, month = {{01}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{34--35}}, series = {{Laudatio}}, title = {{Viața de noapte a doctoratului}}, url = {{https://laudatio.ro/viata-de-noapte-a-doctoratului/}}, volume = {{1}}, year = {{2019}}, }