Reviewing University Community Gardens for Sustainability : taking stock, comparisons with urban community gardens and mapping research opportunities
(2018) In Local Environment 23(6). p.652-671- Abstract
Community gardens (CGs) in university settings are faced with challenges associated with a transient and inexperienced population of student gardeners, but they also have the potential to have a lasting impact on the food behaviours of many young people. This paper undertakes a systematic critical review of literature about University Community Gardens for Sustainability (UCGS) in order to suggest directions of future research in the emerging field research about CGs within and outside of universities. The literature shows that UCGS have similar benefits to those identified in urban CG literature; but with greater emphasis on both the educational and environmental sustainability benefits, suggesting an under-used potential of CGs in... (More)
Community gardens (CGs) in university settings are faced with challenges associated with a transient and inexperienced population of student gardeners, but they also have the potential to have a lasting impact on the food behaviours of many young people. This paper undertakes a systematic critical review of literature about University Community Gardens for Sustainability (UCGS) in order to suggest directions of future research in the emerging field research about CGs within and outside of universities. The literature shows that UCGS have similar benefits to those identified in urban CG literature; but with greater emphasis on both the educational and environmental sustainability benefits, suggesting an under-used potential of CGs in these areas. We argue that a better understanding of the particular challenges and benefits of UCGS could improve outcomes of CGs in all settings. Therefore we recommend that future should explore: (1) participant transience in CGs, thereby helping sustainability projects with large volunteer bases learn to cope with challenges this poses in order to maximise the garden’s impacts; (2) whether/how participating in CGs can contribute to changes in attitudes/behaviours with regards to sustainability and be used as a tool for Education for Sustainability in and outside of university settings and (3) failed cases of CGs to genuinely understand factors that contribute to success. By addressing these areas we can improve our understanding of how community gardening can contribute to our communities, universities and environment, and can begin to make these potential contributions a reality.
(Less)
- author
- Laycock Pedersen, Rebecca LU and Robinson, Zoe
- publishing date
- 2018-06-03
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Education for sustainability, failure, higher education, transience, urban agriculture, volunteers
- in
- Local Environment
- volume
- 23
- issue
- 6
- pages
- 20 pages
- publisher
- Routledge
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85045439251
- ISSN
- 1354-9839
- DOI
- 10.1080/13549839.2018.1463210
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- additional info
- Publisher Copyright: © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
- id
- 6448fcec-bbeb-4525-baa0-9bf02d124660
- date added to LUP
- 2024-09-18 14:58:25
- date last changed
- 2025-04-04 14:05:54
@article{6448fcec-bbeb-4525-baa0-9bf02d124660,
abstract = {{<p>Community gardens (CGs) in university settings are faced with challenges associated with a transient and inexperienced population of student gardeners, but they also have the potential to have a lasting impact on the food behaviours of many young people. This paper undertakes a systematic critical review of literature about University Community Gardens for Sustainability (UCGS) in order to suggest directions of future research in the emerging field research about CGs within and outside of universities. The literature shows that UCGS have similar benefits to those identified in urban CG literature; but with greater emphasis on both the educational and environmental sustainability benefits, suggesting an under-used potential of CGs in these areas. We argue that a better understanding of the particular challenges and benefits of UCGS could improve outcomes of CGs in all settings. Therefore we recommend that future should explore: (1) participant transience in CGs, thereby helping sustainability projects with large volunteer bases learn to cope with challenges this poses in order to maximise the garden’s impacts; (2) whether/how participating in CGs can contribute to changes in attitudes/behaviours with regards to sustainability and be used as a tool for Education for Sustainability in and outside of university settings and (3) failed cases of CGs to genuinely understand factors that contribute to success. By addressing these areas we can improve our understanding of how community gardening can contribute to our communities, universities and environment, and can begin to make these potential contributions a reality.</p>}},
author = {{Laycock Pedersen, Rebecca and Robinson, Zoe}},
issn = {{1354-9839}},
keywords = {{Education for sustainability; failure; higher education; transience; urban agriculture; volunteers}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{06}},
number = {{6}},
pages = {{652--671}},
publisher = {{Routledge}},
series = {{Local Environment}},
title = {{Reviewing University Community Gardens for Sustainability : taking stock, comparisons with urban community gardens and mapping research opportunities}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2018.1463210}},
doi = {{10.1080/13549839.2018.1463210}},
volume = {{23}},
year = {{2018}},
}