Interdisciplinary risks–a delicate balance between trust and critical review
(2025) In Journal of Risk Research 28(3-4). p.197-202- Abstract
We argue that the subject matter and objectives of risk science establish it as an inherently interdisciplinary field, closely connected to both academic disciplines and practical applications. However, risk research faces a range of interdisciplinary challenges. These include the production of low-quality research—characterised by superficial and insufficiently grounded conclusions—a lack of mutual trust between disciplines, limited understanding of risk research, and cultural, institutional, or epistemological oversimplification. Organisations such as the Society for Risk Analysis (SRA) and SRA Europe play a critical role not only in defining the scope of risk research but also in managing its epistemic risks. Effective management of... (More)
We argue that the subject matter and objectives of risk science establish it as an inherently interdisciplinary field, closely connected to both academic disciplines and practical applications. However, risk research faces a range of interdisciplinary challenges. These include the production of low-quality research—characterised by superficial and insufficiently grounded conclusions—a lack of mutual trust between disciplines, limited understanding of risk research, and cultural, institutional, or epistemological oversimplification. Organisations such as the Society for Risk Analysis (SRA) and SRA Europe play a critical role not only in defining the scope of risk research but also in managing its epistemic risks. Effective management of these interdisciplinary challenges can enhance the field’s credibility and increase its appeal to prospective researchers. Therefore, we recommend that contemporary risk researchers actively engage with both risk-related and non-risk disciplines to strengthen the field’s foundations and broaden its impact.
(Less)
- author
- Sahlin, Ullrika
LU
and Thorén, Henrik
LU
- organization
-
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences (MGeo)
- Computational Science for Health and Environment (research group)
- MERGE: ModElling the Regional and Global Earth system
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Science (CEC)
- BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate
- LU Profile Area: Nature-based future solutions
- LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies)
- Theoretical Philosophy
- publishing date
- 2025
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- epistemic risk, Interdisciplinary, risk research, trust
- in
- Journal of Risk Research
- volume
- 28
- issue
- 3-4
- pages
- 6 pages
- publisher
- Routledge
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:105010679009
- ISSN
- 1366-9877
- DOI
- 10.1080/13669877.2025.2526473
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 20715fc1-b972-489c-aaa5-09f0c242cf56
- date added to LUP
- 2026-01-27 15:47:12
- date last changed
- 2026-01-27 15:47:45
@misc{20715fc1-b972-489c-aaa5-09f0c242cf56,
abstract = {{<p>We argue that the subject matter and objectives of risk science establish it as an inherently interdisciplinary field, closely connected to both academic disciplines and practical applications. However, risk research faces a range of interdisciplinary challenges. These include the production of low-quality research—characterised by superficial and insufficiently grounded conclusions—a lack of mutual trust between disciplines, limited understanding of risk research, and cultural, institutional, or epistemological oversimplification. Organisations such as the Society for Risk Analysis (SRA) and SRA Europe play a critical role not only in defining the scope of risk research but also in managing its epistemic risks. Effective management of these interdisciplinary challenges can enhance the field’s credibility and increase its appeal to prospective researchers. Therefore, we recommend that contemporary risk researchers actively engage with both risk-related and non-risk disciplines to strengthen the field’s foundations and broaden its impact.</p>}},
author = {{Sahlin, Ullrika and Thorén, Henrik}},
issn = {{1366-9877}},
keywords = {{epistemic risk; Interdisciplinary; risk research; trust}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{3-4}},
pages = {{197--202}},
publisher = {{Routledge}},
series = {{Journal of Risk Research}},
title = {{Interdisciplinary risks–a delicate balance between trust and critical review}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2025.2526473}},
doi = {{10.1080/13669877.2025.2526473}},
volume = {{28}},
year = {{2025}},
}