Advanced

The shifting role of unions in the social dialogue

Kjellberg, Anders LU (2021) In European Journal of Workplace Innovation 6(2). p.220-244
Abstract
The industrial relations models among the EU/EES countries vary widely. The Nordic model of self-regulation contrasts sharply to French state extension of collective agreements and minimum wage set by the state. While social dialogue often refers to
tripartite negotiations, bipartite collective bargaining is characteristic of self-regulation. Swedish self-regulation is the most far-reaching among the Nordic countries, as state intervention is less common than in Denmark, Finland and Norway. In most EU/EES
countries, in particular the new Central and Eastern European member states and Greece, union power is undermined by declining union density and shrinking coverage of collective agreements. In many cases, international... (More)
The industrial relations models among the EU/EES countries vary widely. The Nordic model of self-regulation contrasts sharply to French state extension of collective agreements and minimum wage set by the state. While social dialogue often refers to
tripartite negotiations, bipartite collective bargaining is characteristic of self-regulation. Swedish self-regulation is the most far-reaching among the Nordic countries, as state intervention is less common than in Denmark, Finland and Norway. In most EU/EES
countries, in particular the new Central and Eastern European member states and Greece, union power is undermined by declining union density and shrinking coverage of collective agreements. In many cases, international organisations pushed through
“structural reforms” weakening trade unions. The result is decreased bargaining capacity at industry level and difficulties in avoiding downwards derogations at company level. Even in some core eurozone countries governments have carried through “internal devaluation” to restore competitiveness. High union density (Finland) or high union mobilisation capacity (France) could not prevent this development. The economic performance of a country and degree of globalisation, including the absence of a national currency, appear more important. Swedish union density is still among the highest in the world but has declined considerably in the last twenty years. As a strongly export-dependent country dominated by large transnational groups, is Sweden very exposed to globalisation. This has shifted the balance of power to the advantage of transnational companies, and by that circumscribed the unions’ efforts to achieve developing jobs and improved working environment. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Trade union, social dialogue, union density, collective bargaining, self-regulation, state regulation, globalization, Eurozone, Nordic model, Swedish model, industrial relations, basic agreement, LO, PTK, flexibility, CEE states, EU/EES, statutory minimum wage, internal devaluation, foreign-born, pandemic, sociology, social dialogue, collective bargaining, union density, self-regulation, state regulation, globalization, collective agreement, eurozon, internal devaluation, EU, Sweden, basic agreement, France, Nordic model, Anglo-saxon model, Continental European model, CEE countries, foreign-born, migration, posted workers, health care sector, coverage of collective bargaining, workplace innovatioon, IF Metall, Kommunal, Ghent system, Ghent countries, sustainable work, industrial relations, Sociology
in
European Journal of Workplace Innovation
volume
6
issue
2
pages
25 pages
ISSN
2387-4570
project
Trade Unions in Europe (27 EU countries)
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
Special Issue: European Approaches to Sustainable Work
id
3762b0d8-0aca-4ddc-a9eb-9fdc76ebf42c
date added to LUP
2021-01-29 13:48:56
date last changed
2021-03-08 15:50:40
@article{3762b0d8-0aca-4ddc-a9eb-9fdc76ebf42c,
  abstract     = {The industrial relations models among the EU/EES countries vary widely. The Nordic model of self-regulation contrasts sharply to French state extension of collective agreements and minimum wage set by the state. While social dialogue often refers to <br/>tripartite negotiations, bipartite collective bargaining is characteristic of self-regulation. Swedish self-regulation is the most far-reaching among the Nordic countries, as state intervention is less common than in Denmark, Finland and Norway. In most EU/EES <br/>countries, in particular the new Central and Eastern European member states and Greece, union power is undermined by declining union density and shrinking coverage of collective agreements. In many cases, international organisations pushed through <br/>“structural reforms” weakening trade unions. The result is decreased bargaining capacity at industry level and difficulties in avoiding downwards derogations at company level. Even in some core eurozone countries governments have carried through “internal devaluation” to restore competitiveness. High union density (Finland) or high union mobilisation capacity (France) could not prevent this development. The economic performance of a country and degree of globalisation, including the absence of a national currency, appear more important. Swedish union density is still among the highest in the world but has declined considerably in the last twenty years. As a strongly export-dependent country dominated by large transnational groups, is Sweden very exposed to globalisation. This has shifted the balance of power to the advantage of transnational companies, and by that circumscribed the unions’ efforts to achieve developing jobs and improved working environment.},
  author       = {Kjellberg, Anders},
  issn         = {2387-4570},
  language     = {eng},
  month        = {03},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {220--244},
  series       = {European Journal of Workplace Innovation},
  title        = {The shifting role of unions in the social dialogue},
  url          = {https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/ws/files/94935911/Unions_in_social_dialogue_Kjellberg_Workplace_Innovation.pdf},
  volume       = {6},
  year         = {2021},
}