Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

How something can be said about telling more than we can know: On choice blindness and introspection

Johansson, Petter LU ; Hall, Lars LU ; Sikström, Sverker LU orcid ; Tärning, Betty LU and Lind, Andreas LU (2006) In Consciousness and Cognition 15(4). p.673-692
Abstract
The legacy of Nisbett and Wilson's classic article, Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes (1977), is mixed. It is perhaps the most cited article in the recent history of consciousness studies, yet no empirical research program currently exists that continues the work presented in the article. To remedy this, we have introduced an experimental paradigm we call choice blindness [Johansson, P., Hall, L., Sikstrom, S., & Olsson, A. (2005). Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. Science, 310(5745), 116-119.]. In the choice blindness paradigm participants fail to notice mismatches between their intended choice and the outcome they are presented with, while... (More)
The legacy of Nisbett and Wilson's classic article, Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes (1977), is mixed. It is perhaps the most cited article in the recent history of consciousness studies, yet no empirical research program currently exists that continues the work presented in the article. To remedy this, we have introduced an experimental paradigm we call choice blindness [Johansson, P., Hall, L., Sikstrom, S., & Olsson, A. (2005). Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. Science, 310(5745), 116-119.]. In the choice blindness paradigm participants fail to notice mismatches between their intended choice and the outcome they are presented with, while nevertheless offering introspectively derived reasons for why they chose the way they did. In this article, we use word-frequency and latent semantic analysis (LSA) to investigate a corpus of introspective reports collected within the choice blindness paradigm. We contrast the introspective reasons given in non-manipulated vs. manipulated trials, but find very few differences between these two groups of reports. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Latent Semantic Analysis, verbal report, blindness, change, word-frequency analysis, choice blindness, introspection, confabulation
in
Consciousness and Cognition
volume
15
issue
4
pages
673 - 692
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • wos:000243264500005
  • scopus:33845467071
  • pmid:17049881
ISSN
1090-2376
DOI
10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.004
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
fe9e6148-08f3-4f67-a8bb-497a48a3631e (old id 679502)
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 12:09:48
date last changed
2022-04-05 18:33:31
@article{fe9e6148-08f3-4f67-a8bb-497a48a3631e,
  abstract     = {{The legacy of Nisbett and Wilson's classic article, Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes (1977), is mixed. It is perhaps the most cited article in the recent history of consciousness studies, yet no empirical research program currently exists that continues the work presented in the article. To remedy this, we have introduced an experimental paradigm we call choice blindness [Johansson, P., Hall, L., Sikstrom, S., & Olsson, A. (2005). Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. Science, 310(5745), 116-119.]. In the choice blindness paradigm participants fail to notice mismatches between their intended choice and the outcome they are presented with, while nevertheless offering introspectively derived reasons for why they chose the way they did. In this article, we use word-frequency and latent semantic analysis (LSA) to investigate a corpus of introspective reports collected within the choice blindness paradigm. We contrast the introspective reasons given in non-manipulated vs. manipulated trials, but find very few differences between these two groups of reports. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.}},
  author       = {{Johansson, Petter and Hall, Lars and Sikström, Sverker and Tärning, Betty and Lind, Andreas}},
  issn         = {{1090-2376}},
  keywords     = {{Latent Semantic Analysis; verbal report; blindness; change; word-frequency analysis; choice blindness; introspection; confabulation}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{673--692}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Consciousness and Cognition}},
  title        = {{How something can be said about telling more than we can know: On choice blindness and introspection}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.004}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.004}},
  volume       = {{15}},
  year         = {{2006}},
}