Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Green infrastructure has weak conceptual links with efficient biodiversity conservation

Ekroos, Johan LU ; von Post, Maria LU ; Persson, Anna S. LU ; Stjernman, Martin LU orcid and Olsson, Ola LU orcid (2025) In Ambio 54(7). p.1153-1164
Abstract

To reverse biodiversity loss, creating resilient ecological networks has been promoted in policy and practice. However, we argue that emphasising networks within policy without clear conservation prioritisations may direct focus away from ecological processes important for population persistence. We studied the rationale for resilient ecological networks represented in a policy context, by reviewing research related to biodiversity within the concept of green infrastructure in European policy. We compared this outcome with underlying empirical evidence for effects of landscape properties on ecological processes relevant to population persistence. We show that interventions within green infrastructure research partly diverge from... (More)

To reverse biodiversity loss, creating resilient ecological networks has been promoted in policy and practice. However, we argue that emphasising networks within policy without clear conservation prioritisations may direct focus away from ecological processes important for population persistence. We studied the rationale for resilient ecological networks represented in a policy context, by reviewing research related to biodiversity within the concept of green infrastructure in European policy. We compared this outcome with underlying empirical evidence for effects of landscape properties on ecological processes relevant to population persistence. We show that interventions within green infrastructure research partly diverge from evidence of efficient conservation derived from empirical studies, likely linked to an insufficient acknowledgement of ecological processes determining long-term conservation of populations in GI policy and research. We discuss possible implications for biodiversity conservation and argue for upcoming policies to better integrate scientific evidence and underlying ecological processes to improve biodiversity outcomes.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Biodiversity policy, Conservation prioritisation, Ecological networks, EU Nature Restoration Law, Evidence-based conservation
in
Ambio
volume
54
issue
7
article number
103775
pages
12 pages
publisher
Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
external identifiers
  • pmid:39985732
  • scopus:85219186504
ISSN
0044-7447
DOI
10.1007/s13280-025-02149-1
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
99f951c8-1a70-4529-913c-695c3cf0cc37
date added to LUP
2025-06-30 10:15:38
date last changed
2025-07-01 15:13:16
@article{99f951c8-1a70-4529-913c-695c3cf0cc37,
  abstract     = {{<p>To reverse biodiversity loss, creating resilient ecological networks has been promoted in policy and practice. However, we argue that emphasising networks within policy without clear conservation prioritisations may direct focus away from ecological processes important for population persistence. We studied the rationale for resilient ecological networks represented in a policy context, by reviewing research related to biodiversity within the concept of green infrastructure in European policy. We compared this outcome with underlying empirical evidence for effects of landscape properties on ecological processes relevant to population persistence. We show that interventions within green infrastructure research partly diverge from evidence of efficient conservation derived from empirical studies, likely linked to an insufficient acknowledgement of ecological processes determining long-term conservation of populations in GI policy and research. We discuss possible implications for biodiversity conservation and argue for upcoming policies to better integrate scientific evidence and underlying ecological processes to improve biodiversity outcomes.</p>}},
  author       = {{Ekroos, Johan and von Post, Maria and Persson, Anna S. and Stjernman, Martin and Olsson, Ola}},
  issn         = {{0044-7447}},
  keywords     = {{Biodiversity policy; Conservation prioritisation; Ecological networks; EU Nature Restoration Law; Evidence-based conservation}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{7}},
  pages        = {{1153--1164}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media B.V.}},
  series       = {{Ambio}},
  title        = {{Green infrastructure has weak conceptual links with efficient biodiversity conservation}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02149-1}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s13280-025-02149-1}},
  volume       = {{54}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}