Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

A framework for assessing the contribution of alternative food initiatives to food system transformations towards sustainability

Laycock Pedersen, Rebecca LU orcid and Nicholas, Kimberly A. LU orcid (2026) In Agriculture and Human Values 43(1).
Abstract

Alternative food initiatives are vital for transforming food systems towards sustainability by challenging, replacing, and complementing the status quo. Understanding how these initiatives contribute to transformation requires attention not only to their intended outcomes but also to the processes through which these outcomes contribute to broader social change. Existing assessment frameworks rarely consider this intersection. To address this gap, we developed a framework that links outcomes of alternative food initiatives to the processes through which they contribute to transformations, drawing on alternative food literature and prefigurative theorising. We then applied the framework to two alternative food initiatives and found we... (More)

Alternative food initiatives are vital for transforming food systems towards sustainability by challenging, replacing, and complementing the status quo. Understanding how these initiatives contribute to transformation requires attention not only to their intended outcomes but also to the processes through which these outcomes contribute to broader social change. Existing assessment frameworks rarely consider this intersection. To address this gap, we developed a framework that links outcomes of alternative food initiatives to the processes through which they contribute to transformations, drawing on alternative food literature and prefigurative theorising. We then applied the framework to two alternative food initiatives and found we were able to (1) identify multiple processes through which their outcomes lead to transformation, and thereby (2) develop a better understanding of how different initiatives approach their contributions to transformations differently. This could enhance evidence gathering, assessment, and communication of their benefits, which could be used by change agents to increase public support, advocate for policy change, and access resources. Furthermore, recognising the differences and complementarities among initiatives could also improve the strategic capacity of alternative food movements by fostering appreciation of diverse change-making practices. By providing a tool for assessing the link between outcomes of alternative food initiatives and the processes through which they contribute to transformations, the framework can support researchers and practitioners to foster more coherent and effective transformative action in the food system.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Developmental evaluation, Micropolitics, Prefiguration, Process, Real utopias, Transition, Typology
in
Agriculture and Human Values
volume
43
issue
1
article number
17
publisher
Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
external identifiers
  • scopus:105025572802
ISSN
0889-048X
DOI
10.1007/s10460-025-10807-z
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
Publisher Copyright: © Crown 2025.
id
a987f99f-faa4-48d9-b4a9-653bf6094d5d
date added to LUP
2026-01-08 11:39:48
date last changed
2026-01-08 13:03:32
@article{a987f99f-faa4-48d9-b4a9-653bf6094d5d,
  abstract     = {{<p>Alternative food initiatives are vital for transforming food systems towards sustainability by challenging, replacing, and complementing the status quo. Understanding how these initiatives contribute to transformation requires attention not only to their intended outcomes but also to the processes through which these outcomes contribute to broader social change. Existing assessment frameworks rarely consider this intersection. To address this gap, we developed a framework that links outcomes of alternative food initiatives to the processes through which they contribute to transformations, drawing on alternative food literature and prefigurative theorising. We then applied the framework to two alternative food initiatives and found we were able to (1) identify multiple processes through which their outcomes lead to transformation, and thereby (2) develop a better understanding of how different initiatives approach their contributions to transformations differently. This could enhance evidence gathering, assessment, and communication of their benefits, which could be used by change agents to increase public support, advocate for policy change, and access resources. Furthermore, recognising the differences and complementarities among initiatives could also improve the strategic capacity of alternative food movements by fostering appreciation of diverse change-making practices. By providing a tool for assessing the link between outcomes of alternative food initiatives and the processes through which they contribute to transformations, the framework can support researchers and practitioners to foster more coherent and effective transformative action in the food system.</p>}},
  author       = {{Laycock Pedersen, Rebecca and Nicholas, Kimberly A.}},
  issn         = {{0889-048X}},
  keywords     = {{Developmental evaluation; Micropolitics; Prefiguration; Process; Real utopias; Transition; Typology}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media B.V.}},
  series       = {{Agriculture and Human Values}},
  title        = {{A framework for assessing the contribution of alternative food initiatives to food system transformations towards sustainability}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10460-025-10807-z}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s10460-025-10807-z}},
  volume       = {{43}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}