Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Satisfaction and seizure outcomes of epilepsy surgery in tuberous sclerosis : A Swedish population-based long-term follow-up study

Pearsson, Kevin LU orcid ; Compagno-Strandberg, Maria LU ; Eklund, Erik A LU ; Rask, Olof LU and Källén, Kristina LU (2022) In Seizure 103. p.39-45
Abstract

PURPOSE: We conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate long-term outcomes of epilepsy surgery in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) in a Swedish population.

METHODS: Demographic and seizure data was retrieved from the Swedish National Epilepsy Surgery Registry and medical records. Patient reported outcome measurements (PROM) were determined by telephonic interviews at long term follow-up.

RESULTS: Median follow-up was 6 y 8 m (range, 3-15 y 1 m) for tuberectomies (n = 15) and 3 y 6 m (range 2-10 y) for callosotomies (n = 7). Eight of the 15 tuberectomy participants were seizure-free. Four out of seven callosotomies were free from drop attacks. PROMs were provided by caregivers of 18/20 participants (data missing for two... (More)

PURPOSE: We conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate long-term outcomes of epilepsy surgery in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) in a Swedish population.

METHODS: Demographic and seizure data was retrieved from the Swedish National Epilepsy Surgery Registry and medical records. Patient reported outcome measurements (PROM) were determined by telephonic interviews at long term follow-up.

RESULTS: Median follow-up was 6 y 8 m (range, 3-15 y 1 m) for tuberectomies (n = 15) and 3 y 6 m (range 2-10 y) for callosotomies (n = 7). Eight of the 15 tuberectomy participants were seizure-free. Four out of seven callosotomies were free from drop attacks. PROMs were provided by caregivers of 18/20 participants (data missing for two callosotomies). In the tuberectomy group, 6/8 patients were seizure-free and 3/7 had continued seizures; surgery was considered satisfactory and beneficial. Overall, satisfaction was high, even among patients who did not achieve remission; 13/15 tuberectomy responders recommended surgery to others with TSC and refractory epilepsy. None of the patients considered the surgery harmful. In the callosotomy group, satisfaction was low and congruent with the seizure outcome. All patients with continued drop attacks were unsatisfied; one considered surgery to be harmful. One participant, who would not recommend surgery to others, still perceived the surgery to be beneficial.

CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that both tuberectomy and callosotomy are effective treatment options for TSC. Factors other than seizure outcomes seemed to have a major influence on satisfaction and perception of the benefit of surgery.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Seizure
volume
103
pages
39 - 45
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:85140314711
  • pmid:36279595
ISSN
1532-2688
DOI
10.1016/j.seizure.2022.10.011
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
id
af3b8233-da45-4904-b778-631ccdedcf7f
date added to LUP
2022-11-12 15:50:49
date last changed
2024-06-10 13:35:04
@article{af3b8233-da45-4904-b778-631ccdedcf7f,
  abstract     = {{<p>PURPOSE: We conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate long-term outcomes of epilepsy surgery in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) in a Swedish population.</p><p>METHODS: Demographic and seizure data was retrieved from the Swedish National Epilepsy Surgery Registry and medical records. Patient reported outcome measurements (PROM) were determined by telephonic interviews at long term follow-up.</p><p>RESULTS: Median follow-up was 6 y 8 m (range, 3-15 y 1 m) for tuberectomies (n = 15) and 3 y 6 m (range 2-10 y) for callosotomies (n = 7). Eight of the 15 tuberectomy participants were seizure-free. Four out of seven callosotomies were free from drop attacks. PROMs were provided by caregivers of 18/20 participants (data missing for two callosotomies). In the tuberectomy group, 6/8 patients were seizure-free and 3/7 had continued seizures; surgery was considered satisfactory and beneficial. Overall, satisfaction was high, even among patients who did not achieve remission; 13/15 tuberectomy responders recommended surgery to others with TSC and refractory epilepsy. None of the patients considered the surgery harmful. In the callosotomy group, satisfaction was low and congruent with the seizure outcome. All patients with continued drop attacks were unsatisfied; one considered surgery to be harmful. One participant, who would not recommend surgery to others, still perceived the surgery to be beneficial.</p><p>CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that both tuberectomy and callosotomy are effective treatment options for TSC. Factors other than seizure outcomes seemed to have a major influence on satisfaction and perception of the benefit of surgery.</p>}},
  author       = {{Pearsson, Kevin and Compagno-Strandberg, Maria and Eklund, Erik A and Rask, Olof and Källén, Kristina}},
  issn         = {{1532-2688}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{10}},
  pages        = {{39--45}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Seizure}},
  title        = {{Satisfaction and seizure outcomes of epilepsy surgery in tuberous sclerosis : A Swedish population-based long-term follow-up study}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2022.10.011}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.seizure.2022.10.011}},
  volume       = {{103}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}