Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Challenges of wealth-based sustainability metrics : A critical appraisal

McLaughlin, Eoin ; Ducoing, Cristián LU orcid and Hanley, Nick (2024) In Ecological Economics 224.
Abstract

There has been widespread debate about whether the way in which we measure economic activity is fit for purpose in the twenty-first century. One aspect of this debate is to move away from measuring a nation's income (GDP) towards monitoring a nation's assets (their inclusive wealth), as a better indicator of sustainable economic development. We provide the first critical comparison of the approaches of leading international organisations – the World Bank and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) – to estimating changes in wealth. Our paper reveals important inconsistencies in how these organisations measure sustainability and the conflicting messages that policy makers receive, despite a common underlying conceptual framework... (More)

There has been widespread debate about whether the way in which we measure economic activity is fit for purpose in the twenty-first century. One aspect of this debate is to move away from measuring a nation's income (GDP) towards monitoring a nation's assets (their inclusive wealth), as a better indicator of sustainable economic development. We provide the first critical comparison of the approaches of leading international organisations – the World Bank and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) – to estimating changes in wealth. Our paper reveals important inconsistencies in how these organisations measure sustainability and the conflicting messages that policy makers receive, despite a common underlying conceptual framework linking changes in a nation's wealth to future well-being. We attribute these differences to methodological (applied theory) choices made by researchers at the respective institutions. These choices matter. At the most extreme, countries that perform the worst according to the UNEP are shown to perform well according to the World Bank. This confusion in signals makes better policy making more difficult.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Natural capital, Sustainability, Sustainable development, Wealth
in
Ecological Economics
volume
224
article number
108308
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:85199964648
ISSN
0921-8009
DOI
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108308
project
Genuine Savings as a measure of sustainable development. Towards a GDP replacement.
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors
id
e9ea196f-7114-48fc-bc6c-3151e918cb60
date added to LUP
2024-08-06 16:09:21
date last changed
2024-08-07 10:12:12
@article{e9ea196f-7114-48fc-bc6c-3151e918cb60,
  abstract     = {{<p>There has been widespread debate about whether the way in which we measure economic activity is fit for purpose in the twenty-first century. One aspect of this debate is to move away from measuring a nation's income (GDP) towards monitoring a nation's assets (their inclusive wealth), as a better indicator of sustainable economic development. We provide the first critical comparison of the approaches of leading international organisations – the World Bank and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) – to estimating changes in wealth. Our paper reveals important inconsistencies in how these organisations measure sustainability and the conflicting messages that policy makers receive, despite a common underlying conceptual framework linking changes in a nation's wealth to future well-being. We attribute these differences to methodological (applied theory) choices made by researchers at the respective institutions. These choices matter. At the most extreme, countries that perform the worst according to the UNEP are shown to perform well according to the World Bank. This confusion in signals makes better policy making more difficult.</p>}},
  author       = {{McLaughlin, Eoin and Ducoing, Cristián and Hanley, Nick}},
  issn         = {{0921-8009}},
  keywords     = {{Natural capital; Sustainability; Sustainable development; Wealth}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Ecological Economics}},
  title        = {{Challenges of wealth-based sustainability metrics : A critical appraisal}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108308}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108308}},
  volume       = {{224}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}