A field evaluation of long-term effects of PIT tagging
Skov, Christian LU ; Hansen, Joan H. ; Baktoft, Henrik ; Brönmark, Christer LU ; Brodersen, Jakob LU ; Chapman, Ben B. LU ; Hansson, Lars Anders LU
; Hulthén, Kaj
LU
and Nilsson, P. Anders
LU
(2020)
In Journal of Fish Biology
96(4).
p.1055-1059
- Abstract
Passive integrated transponder (PIT)-tagging is commonly used in behavioural studies of fish, although long-term evaluations of effects from tagging under natural conditions are scarce. We PIT-tagged common bream Abramis brama, European perch Perca fluviatilis, pike Esox lucius and roach Rutilus rutilus, released them in their lakes of origin and recaptured them after 103–3269 days. Overall, tagged fish did not differ in condition from non-tagged fish, except for small R. rutilus that had a lower length-specific body mass in one lake in 1 year. We conclude that PIT-tagging in general has negligible long-term effects on fish condition.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/c473a6a4-49c9-4f36-9411-ddda6f0a723e
- author
- Skov, Christian
LU
; Hansen, Joan H.
; Baktoft, Henrik
; Brönmark, Christer
LU
; Brodersen, Jakob
LU
; Chapman, Ben B.
LU
; Hansson, Lars Anders
LU
; Hulthén, Kaj
LU
and Nilsson, P. Anders
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2020-04
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Journal of Fish Biology
- volume
- 96
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 5 pages
- publisher
- Wiley-Blackwell
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:32060922
- scopus:85080911694
- ISSN
- 0022-1112
- DOI
- 10.1111/jfb.14292
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- c473a6a4-49c9-4f36-9411-ddda6f0a723e
- date added to LUP
- 2020-03-25 15:53:45
- date last changed
- 2024-07-10 12:27:44
@article{c473a6a4-49c9-4f36-9411-ddda6f0a723e,
abstract = {{<p>Passive integrated transponder (PIT)-tagging is commonly used in behavioural studies of fish, although long-term evaluations of effects from tagging under natural conditions are scarce. We PIT-tagged common bream Abramis brama, European perch Perca fluviatilis, pike Esox lucius and roach Rutilus rutilus, released them in their lakes of origin and recaptured them after 103–3269 days. Overall, tagged fish did not differ in condition from non-tagged fish, except for small R. rutilus that had a lower length-specific body mass in one lake in 1 year. We conclude that PIT-tagging in general has negligible long-term effects on fish condition.</p>}},
author = {{Skov, Christian and Hansen, Joan H. and Baktoft, Henrik and Brönmark, Christer and Brodersen, Jakob and Chapman, Ben B. and Hansson, Lars Anders and Hulthén, Kaj and Nilsson, P. Anders}},
issn = {{0022-1112}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{4}},
pages = {{1055--1059}},
publisher = {{Wiley-Blackwell}},
series = {{Journal of Fish Biology}},
title = {{A field evaluation of long-term effects of PIT tagging}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14292}},
doi = {{10.1111/jfb.14292}},
volume = {{96}},
year = {{2020}},
}