Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Comparison of molecular and emulsifying properties of gum arabic and mesquite gum using asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation

Alftrén, Johan LU ; Penarrieta, Mauricio LU ; Bergenståhl, Björn LU and Nilsson, Lars LU (2012) In Food Hydrocolloids 26(1). p.54-62
Abstract
The molecular and emulsifying properties of gum arabic (GA) and mesquite gum (MG) were characterized using asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation connected to multi-angle light scattering and refractive index detection. Properties such as molar mass, root-mean-square radius (rrms), hydrodynamic radius (rh), conformation, apparent densities and distribution of proteinaceous matter over the whole molar mass range were determined. GA displayed a low molar mass (3.4 × 105 g/mol), protein-poor component (population 1) and a high molar mass (1.9 × 106 g/mol), protein-rich component (population 2). MG displayed one molar mass population with an average molar mass of 1.1 × 106 g/mol. For both GA and MG, the conformation (rrms/rh) was... (More)
The molecular and emulsifying properties of gum arabic (GA) and mesquite gum (MG) were characterized using asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation connected to multi-angle light scattering and refractive index detection. Properties such as molar mass, root-mean-square radius (rrms), hydrodynamic radius (rh), conformation, apparent densities and distribution of proteinaceous matter over the whole molar mass range were determined. GA displayed a low molar mass (3.4 × 105 g/mol), protein-poor component (population 1) and a high molar mass (1.9 × 106 g/mol), protein-rich component (population 2). MG displayed one molar mass population with an average molar mass of 1.1 × 106 g/mol. For both GA and MG, the conformation (rrms/rh) was increasingly spherical with increasing molar mass. However, MG had higher values of rrms/rh for a specific molar mass suggesting differences in structure between GA and MG. The protein content increased with increasing molar mass for both gums, although to a higher extent for GA. Selective adsorption, during emulsification experiments, could be observed of population 2 of GA which may be due to a combination of the higher protein content and a more flexible structure rendering it more surface active than population 1. Comparing GA and MG in terms of emulsion stability, it could be concluded that GA-stabilized emulsions have considerably higher stability against coalescence. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Gum arabic, Hydrocolloids, Exudate gums, Field-flow fractionation, Mesquite gum, Emulsion
in
Food Hydrocolloids
volume
26
issue
1
pages
54 - 62
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • wos:000293731800007
  • scopus:79961167694
ISSN
0268-005X
DOI
10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.04.008
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
5876e566-db98-4f57-9400-1a485b6f14be (old id 2153071)
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 10:03:24
date last changed
2023-12-08 08:38:21
@article{5876e566-db98-4f57-9400-1a485b6f14be,
  abstract     = {{The molecular and emulsifying properties of gum arabic (GA) and mesquite gum (MG) were characterized using asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation connected to multi-angle light scattering and refractive index detection. Properties such as molar mass, root-mean-square radius (rrms), hydrodynamic radius (rh), conformation, apparent densities and distribution of proteinaceous matter over the whole molar mass range were determined. GA displayed a low molar mass (3.4 × 105 g/mol), protein-poor component (population 1) and a high molar mass (1.9 × 106 g/mol), protein-rich component (population 2). MG displayed one molar mass population with an average molar mass of 1.1 × 106 g/mol. For both GA and MG, the conformation (rrms/rh) was increasingly spherical with increasing molar mass. However, MG had higher values of rrms/rh for a specific molar mass suggesting differences in structure between GA and MG. The protein content increased with increasing molar mass for both gums, although to a higher extent for GA. Selective adsorption, during emulsification experiments, could be observed of population 2 of GA which may be due to a combination of the higher protein content and a more flexible structure rendering it more surface active than population 1. Comparing GA and MG in terms of emulsion stability, it could be concluded that GA-stabilized emulsions have considerably higher stability against coalescence.}},
  author       = {{Alftrén, Johan and Penarrieta, Mauricio and Bergenståhl, Björn and Nilsson, Lars}},
  issn         = {{0268-005X}},
  keywords     = {{Gum arabic; Hydrocolloids; Exudate gums; Field-flow fractionation; Mesquite gum; Emulsion}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{54--62}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Food Hydrocolloids}},
  title        = {{Comparison of molecular and emulsifying properties of gum arabic and mesquite gum using asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.04.008}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.04.008}},
  volume       = {{26}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}