Framing Social Interaction : Continuities and Cracks in Goffman's Frame Analysis
(2018)- Abstract
- This book is about Erving Goffman’s frame analysis as it, on the one hand, was presented in his 1974 book Frame Analysis and, on the other, was actually conducted in a number of preceding substantial analyses of different aspects of social interaction such as face-work, impression management, fun in games, behavior in public places and stigmatization. There was, in other words, a frame analytic continuity in Goffman’s work. In an article published after his death in 1982, Goffman also maintained that he throughout his career had been studying the same object: the interaction order. In this book, the author states that Goffman also applied an overarching perspective on social interaction: the dynamic relation between ritualization,... (More)
- This book is about Erving Goffman’s frame analysis as it, on the one hand, was presented in his 1974 book Frame Analysis and, on the other, was actually conducted in a number of preceding substantial analyses of different aspects of social interaction such as face-work, impression management, fun in games, behavior in public places and stigmatization. There was, in other words, a frame analytic continuity in Goffman’s work. In an article published after his death in 1982, Goffman also maintained that he throughout his career had been studying the same object: the interaction order. In this book, the author states that Goffman also applied an overarching perspective on social interaction: the dynamic relation between ritualization, vulnerability and working consensus. However, there were also cracks in Goffman´s work and one is shown here with reference to the leading question in Frame Analysis – what is it that’s going on here? While framed on a "microsocial" level, that question ties in with "the interaction order" and frame analysis as a method. If, however, it is framed on a societal level, it mirrors metareflective and metasocial manifestations of changes and unrest in the interaction order that, in some ways, herald the emphasis on contingency, uncertainty and risk in later sociology. Through analyses of social media as a possible new interaction order – where frame disputes are frequent – and of interactional power, the applicability of Goffman’s frame analysis is illustrated. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/8d794edd-03fa-46ba-8e8e-40fad37de3ad
- author
- Persson, Anders LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2018
- type
- Book/Report
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- frame, frame analysis, framing, social interaction, interaction order, Erving Goffman, ritualization, vulnerability, working consensus, social media, online chess, interactional power, Las Vegas
- edition
- 1
- pages
- 188 pages
- publisher
- Routledge
- ISBN
- 9781472482587
- 9781315582931
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 8d794edd-03fa-46ba-8e8e-40fad37de3ad
- date added to LUP
- 2018-07-26 07:58:33
- date last changed
- 2022-09-07 10:41:02
@book{8d794edd-03fa-46ba-8e8e-40fad37de3ad,
abstract = {{This book is about Erving Goffman’s frame analysis as it, on the one hand, was presented in his 1974 book Frame Analysis and, on the other, was actually conducted in a number of preceding substantial analyses of different aspects of social interaction such as face-work, impression management, fun in games, behavior in public places and stigmatization. There was, in other words, a frame analytic continuity in Goffman’s work. In an article published after his death in 1982, Goffman also maintained that he throughout his career had been studying the same object: the interaction order. In this book, the author states that Goffman also applied an overarching perspective on social interaction: the dynamic relation between ritualization, vulnerability and working consensus. However, there were also cracks in Goffman´s work and one is shown here with reference to the leading question in Frame Analysis – what is it that’s going on here? While framed on a "microsocial" level, that question ties in with "the interaction order" and frame analysis as a method. If, however, it is framed on a societal level, it mirrors metareflective and metasocial manifestations of changes and unrest in the interaction order that, in some ways, herald the emphasis on contingency, uncertainty and risk in later sociology. Through analyses of social media as a possible new interaction order – where frame disputes are frequent – and of interactional power, the applicability of Goffman’s frame analysis is illustrated.}},
author = {{Persson, Anders}},
isbn = {{9781472482587}},
keywords = {{frame; frame analysis; framing; social interaction; interaction order; Erving Goffman; ritualization; vulnerability; working consensus; social media; online chess; interactional power; Las Vegas}},
language = {{eng}},
publisher = {{Routledge}},
title = {{Framing Social Interaction : Continuities and Cracks in Goffman's Frame Analysis}},
url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/74985595/Framing_Social_Interaction.pdf}},
year = {{2018}},
}