Correlation between ADC, ADC ratio, and Gleason Grade group in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy : Retrospective multicenter study with different MRI scanners
(2023) In Frontiers in Oncology 13.- Abstract
- Background: MRI is an important tool in the prostate cancer work-up, with special emphasis on the ADC sequence. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between ADC and ADC ratio compared to tumor aggressiveness determined by a histopathological examination after radical prostatectomy.
Methods: Ninety-eight patients with prostate cancer underwent MRI at five different hospitals prior to radical prostatectomy. Images were retrospectively analyzed individually by two radiologists. The ADC of the index lesion and reference tissues (contralateral normal prostatic, normal peripheral zone, and urine) was recorded. Absolute ADC and different ADC ratios were compared to tumor aggressivity according to the ISUP Gleason Grade Groups... (More) - Background: MRI is an important tool in the prostate cancer work-up, with special emphasis on the ADC sequence. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between ADC and ADC ratio compared to tumor aggressiveness determined by a histopathological examination after radical prostatectomy.
Methods: Ninety-eight patients with prostate cancer underwent MRI at five different hospitals prior to radical prostatectomy. Images were retrospectively analyzed individually by two radiologists. The ADC of the index lesion and reference tissues (contralateral normal prostatic, normal peripheral zone, and urine) was recorded. Absolute ADC and different ADC ratios were compared to tumor aggressivity according to the ISUP Gleason Grade Groups extracted from the pathology report using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ). ROC curves were used to evaluate the ability to discriminate between ISUP 1-2 and ISUP 3-5 and intra class correlation and Bland-Altman plots for interrater reliability.
Results: All patients had prostate cancer classified as ISUP grade ≥ 2. No correlation was found between ADC and ISUP grade. We found no benefit of using the ADC ratio over absolute ADC. The AUC for all metrics was close to 0.5, and no threshold could be extracted for prediction of tumor aggressivity. The interrater reliability was substantial to almost perfect for all variables analyzed.
Conclusions: ADC and ADC ratio did not correlate with tumor aggressiveness defined by ISUP grade in this multicenter MRI study. The result of this study is opposite to previous research in the field. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/dad41313-c5a6-4d19-af4a-bcc5a460122a
- author
- Bengtsson, Johan LU ; Thimansson, Erik LU ; Baubeta, Erik LU ; Zackrisson, Sophia LU ; Sundgren, Pia Charlotte LU ; Bjartell, Anders LU and Flondell-Sité, Despina LU
- organization
-
- LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre
- Diagnostic Radiology, (Lund)
- Radiology Diagnostics, Malmö (research group)
- LU Profile Area: Light and Materials
- LTH Profile Area: Photon Science and Technology
- EpiHealth: Epidemiology for Health
- Lund University Bioimaging Center
- Neuroradiology (research group)
- Division of Translational Cancer Research
- eSSENCE: The e-Science Collaboration
- Urological cancer, Malmö (research group)
- Department of Translational Medicine
- publishing date
- 2023
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- ADC, MR-diffusion, MRI, neoplasms, prostate
- in
- Frontiers in Oncology
- volume
- 13
- article number
- 1079040
- publisher
- Frontiers Media S. A.
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85149630447
- pmid:36890837
- ISSN
- 2234-943X
- DOI
- 10.3389/fonc.2023.1079040
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- dad41313-c5a6-4d19-af4a-bcc5a460122a
- date added to LUP
- 2023-02-23 13:02:30
- date last changed
- 2024-02-12 08:17:17
@article{dad41313-c5a6-4d19-af4a-bcc5a460122a, abstract = {{Background: MRI is an important tool in the prostate cancer work-up, with special emphasis on the ADC sequence. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between ADC and ADC ratio compared to tumor aggressiveness determined by a histopathological examination after radical prostatectomy.<br/>Methods: Ninety-eight patients with prostate cancer underwent MRI at five different hospitals prior to radical prostatectomy. Images were retrospectively analyzed individually by two radiologists. The ADC of the index lesion and reference tissues (contralateral normal prostatic, normal peripheral zone, and urine) was recorded. Absolute ADC and different ADC ratios were compared to tumor aggressivity according to the ISUP Gleason Grade Groups extracted from the pathology report using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ). ROC curves were used to evaluate the ability to discriminate between ISUP 1-2 and ISUP 3-5 and intra class correlation and Bland-Altman plots for interrater reliability.<br/>Results: All patients had prostate cancer classified as ISUP grade ≥ 2. No correlation was found between ADC and ISUP grade. We found no benefit of using the ADC ratio over absolute ADC. The AUC for all metrics was close to 0.5, and no threshold could be extracted for prediction of tumor aggressivity. The interrater reliability was substantial to almost perfect for all variables analyzed.<br/>Conclusions: ADC and ADC ratio did not correlate with tumor aggressiveness defined by ISUP grade in this multicenter MRI study. The result of this study is opposite to previous research in the field.}}, author = {{Bengtsson, Johan and Thimansson, Erik and Baubeta, Erik and Zackrisson, Sophia and Sundgren, Pia Charlotte and Bjartell, Anders and Flondell-Sité, Despina}}, issn = {{2234-943X}}, keywords = {{ADC; MR-diffusion; MRI; neoplasms; prostate}}, language = {{eng}}, publisher = {{Frontiers Media S. A.}}, series = {{Frontiers in Oncology}}, title = {{Correlation between ADC, ADC ratio, and Gleason Grade group in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy : Retrospective multicenter study with different MRI scanners}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1079040}}, doi = {{10.3389/fonc.2023.1079040}}, volume = {{13}}, year = {{2023}}, }