Negotiating ‘Voice’ in the Space Between: Using digital platforms for transformative and transnational knowledge production
(2018) ECER 2018 - Emerging Researchers' Conference- Abstract
- In this paper, we present the findings of a Universitas 21 (U21) Graduate Research Project collaboration between Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, the University of Nottingham, England, and Lund University, Sweden. This project brought together six doctoral candidates at various stages in their postgraduate careers. The students had conducted qualitative and quantitative inquiry into diverse educational topics but all within contexts of public policies of privatisation. In Chile, England and Sweden these changes have been experienced at a pace and scale quite unprecedented elsewhere. Each doctoral research project was individual in terms of its original research design: aims and purpose, methodology, methods and analytical... (More)
- In this paper, we present the findings of a Universitas 21 (U21) Graduate Research Project collaboration between Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, the University of Nottingham, England, and Lund University, Sweden. This project brought together six doctoral candidates at various stages in their postgraduate careers. The students had conducted qualitative and quantitative inquiry into diverse educational topics but all within contexts of public policies of privatisation. In Chile, England and Sweden these changes have been experienced at a pace and scale quite unprecedented elsewhere. Each doctoral research project was individual in terms of its original research design: aims and purpose, methodology, methods and analytical approach. However, an important commonality across all the studies was the adoption of a critical theoretical framework in which an examination of the marginality of public participants’ voices was central to the research findings. Acknowledging that the ‘public’ is ‘a problematic subject… It is shape shifting, unstable and unpredictable. It embodies conflicting or ambivalent desires and doubts’ (Clarke and Newman, 2009, p.43), this concept required further interrogation. This paper is therefore a meta-analysis of our critical comparative work and explores the following question: how are the voices of different ‘publics’ marginalised in diverse privatised educational contexts? (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/2c0e7fb4-5a65-45bc-86e9-61c97623be28
- author
- Winchip, Emily ; Örbring, David LU ; Milner, Alison ; Perez Navarro, Camila and Barco Lillo, Blanca
- organization
- publishing date
- 2018
- type
- Contribution to conference
- publication status
- published
- subject
- conference name
- ECER 2018 - Emerging Researchers' Conference
- conference location
- Bolzano, Italy
- conference dates
- 2018-09-03 - 2018-09-04
- language
- Swedish
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 2c0e7fb4-5a65-45bc-86e9-61c97623be28
- alternative location
- https://eera-ecer.de/ecer-programmes/conference/23/contribution/43600/
- date added to LUP
- 2018-11-21 15:36:47
- date last changed
- 2021-03-22 17:24:29
@misc{2c0e7fb4-5a65-45bc-86e9-61c97623be28, abstract = {{In this paper, we present the findings of a Universitas 21 (U21) Graduate Research Project collaboration between Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, the University of Nottingham, England, and Lund University, Sweden. This project brought together six doctoral candidates at various stages in their postgraduate careers. The students had conducted qualitative and quantitative inquiry into diverse educational topics but all within contexts of public policies of privatisation. In Chile, England and Sweden these changes have been experienced at a pace and scale quite unprecedented elsewhere. Each doctoral research project was individual in terms of its original research design: aims and purpose, methodology, methods and analytical approach. However, an important commonality across all the studies was the adoption of a critical theoretical framework in which an examination of the marginality of public participants’ voices was central to the research findings. Acknowledging that the ‘public’ is ‘a problematic subject… It is shape shifting, unstable and unpredictable. It embodies conflicting or ambivalent desires and doubts’ (Clarke and Newman, 2009, p.43), this concept required further interrogation. This paper is therefore a meta-analysis of our critical comparative work and explores the following question: how are the voices of different ‘publics’ marginalised in diverse privatised educational contexts?}}, author = {{Winchip, Emily and Örbring, David and Milner, Alison and Perez Navarro, Camila and Barco Lillo, Blanca}}, language = {{swe}}, title = {{Negotiating ‘Voice’ in the Space Between: Using digital platforms for transformative and transnational knowledge production}}, url = {{https://eera-ecer.de/ecer-programmes/conference/23/contribution/43600/}}, year = {{2018}}, }