The influence of voice quality on sentence processing and recall performance in school-age children with normal hearing
Brännström, Jonas LU ; Kastberg, Tobias LU ; von Lochow, Heike LU ; Haake, Magnus LU ; Sahlén, Birgitta LU
and Lyberg-Åhlander, Viveka
LU
(2018)
In Speech, Language and Hearing
21(1).
p.1-9
- Abstract
Previous findings suggest that working memory capacity (WMC) is influenced by a dysphonic voice quality. The present study examines the influence of voice quality on sentence processing and word recall in a working memory task. Fifty-seven children (8:1–9:1 years old) with normal hearing participated. Working memory capacity (WMC) was assessed using a competing language processing task (CLPT) which consists of a sentence processing segment (judgements of semantic acceptability in sentences) and a final word recall segment. All children completed two versions of the CLPT; once listening to a typical voice and once listening to a vocally loading induced dysphonic voice. The two voices were recorded from the same female speaker. In... (More)
Previous findings suggest that working memory capacity (WMC) is influenced by a dysphonic voice quality. The present study examines the influence of voice quality on sentence processing and word recall in a working memory task. Fifty-seven children (8:1–9:1 years old) with normal hearing participated. Working memory capacity (WMC) was assessed using a competing language processing task (CLPT) which consists of a sentence processing segment (judgements of semantic acceptability in sentences) and a final word recall segment. All children completed two versions of the CLPT; once listening to a typical voice and once listening to a vocally loading induced dysphonic voice. The two voices were recorded from the same female speaker. In addition, the children’s executive functioning was assessed using Elithorn’s mazes. The dysphonic voice quality significantly decreases scores on the sentence processing segment but not on the recall segment. Children with better executive functioning (i.e., response inhibition, organizing, processing, and planning) were less disturbed by the dysphonic voice in the recall segment. Children’s judgements of semantic acceptability in sentences in a working memory task are affected by a dysphonic voice quality, but not the recall segment (the measure of WMC). However, children with lower executive functioning may be more disturbed by the dysphonic voice. These findings suggest that listening to a dysphonic voice seems to require more cognitive resources than listening to a typical voice, but only when the task is sufficiently easy to allow for allocation of cognitive resources to process the degraded signal content. Abbreviations: CLPT: Competing language processing task; ISTS: International speech test signal; RMS: root-mean-square; SLP: speech and language pathologists; WMC: Working memory capacity
(Less)
- author
- Brännström, Jonas
LU
; Kastberg, Tobias
LU
; von Lochow, Heike
LU
; Haake, Magnus
LU
; Sahlén, Birgitta
LU
and Lyberg-Åhlander, Viveka
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2018
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Children, dysphonic voice, voice quality, working memory
- in
- Speech, Language and Hearing
- volume
- 21
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 1 - 9
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85017409018
- ISSN
- 2050-571X
- DOI
- 10.1080/2050571X.2017.1309787
- project
- Thinking in Time: Cognition, Communication and Learning
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 5bb81ee4-1f74-4dbe-ac54-51c5089a2cb3
- date added to LUP
- 2017-05-05 13:10:46
- date last changed
- 2025-04-04 15:20:58
@article{5bb81ee4-1f74-4dbe-ac54-51c5089a2cb3,
abstract = {{<p>Previous findings suggest that working memory capacity (WMC) is influenced by a dysphonic voice quality. The present study examines the influence of voice quality on sentence processing and word recall in a working memory task. Fifty-seven children (8:1–9:1 years old) with normal hearing participated. Working memory capacity (WMC) was assessed using a competing language processing task (CLPT) which consists of a sentence processing segment (judgements of semantic acceptability in sentences) and a final word recall segment. All children completed two versions of the CLPT; once listening to a typical voice and once listening to a vocally loading induced dysphonic voice. The two voices were recorded from the same female speaker. In addition, the children’s executive functioning was assessed using Elithorn’s mazes. The dysphonic voice quality significantly decreases scores on the sentence processing segment but not on the recall segment. Children with better executive functioning (i.e., response inhibition, organizing, processing, and planning) were less disturbed by the dysphonic voice in the recall segment. Children’s judgements of semantic acceptability in sentences in a working memory task are affected by a dysphonic voice quality, but not the recall segment (the measure of WMC). However, children with lower executive functioning may be more disturbed by the dysphonic voice. These findings suggest that listening to a dysphonic voice seems to require more cognitive resources than listening to a typical voice, but only when the task is sufficiently easy to allow for allocation of cognitive resources to process the degraded signal content. Abbreviations: CLPT: Competing language processing task; ISTS: International speech test signal; RMS: root-mean-square; SLP: speech and language pathologists; WMC: Working memory capacity</p>}},
author = {{Brännström, Jonas and Kastberg, Tobias and von Lochow, Heike and Haake, Magnus and Sahlén, Birgitta and Lyberg-Åhlander, Viveka}},
issn = {{2050-571X}},
keywords = {{Children; dysphonic voice; voice quality; working memory}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{1--9}},
publisher = {{Taylor & Francis}},
series = {{Speech, Language and Hearing}},
title = {{The influence of voice quality on sentence processing and recall performance in school-age children with normal hearing}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2017.1309787}},
doi = {{10.1080/2050571X.2017.1309787}},
volume = {{21}},
year = {{2018}},
}