Advanced

A framework to identify indicator species for ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes

Birkhofer, Klaus LU ; Rusch, Adrien; Andersson, Georg K.S. LU ; Bommarco, Riccardo LU ; Dänhardt, Juliana LU ; Ekbom, Barbara; Jönsson, Annelie LU ; Lindborg, Regina; Olsson, Ola LU and Rader, Romina, et al. (2018) In Ecological Indicators 91. p.278-286
Abstract

Improving our understanding of the relationships between biodiversity and the delivery of ecosystem services is crucial for the development of sustainable agriculture. We introduce a novel framework that is based on the identification of indicator species for single or multiple ecosystem services across taxonomic groups based on indicator species analyses. We utilize multi-species community data (unlike previous single species approaches) without giving up information about the identity of species in our framework (unlike previous species richness approaches). We compiled a comprehensive community dataset including abundances of 683 invertebrate, vertebrate and plant species to identify indicator species that were either positively or... (More)

Improving our understanding of the relationships between biodiversity and the delivery of ecosystem services is crucial for the development of sustainable agriculture. We introduce a novel framework that is based on the identification of indicator species for single or multiple ecosystem services across taxonomic groups based on indicator species analyses. We utilize multi-species community data (unlike previous single species approaches) without giving up information about the identity of species in our framework (unlike previous species richness approaches). We compiled a comprehensive community dataset including abundances of 683 invertebrate, vertebrate and plant species to identify indicator species that were either positively or negatively related to biological control, diversity of red-listed species or crop yield in agricultural landscapes in southern Sweden. Our results demonstrate that some taxonomic groups include significantly higher percentages of indicator species for these ecosystem services. Spider communities for example included a higher percentage of significant positive indicator species for biological control than ground or rove beetle communities. Bundles of indicator species for the analysed ecosystem service potentials usually included species that could be linked to the respective ecosystem service based on their functional role in local communities. Several of these species are conspicuous enough to be monitored by trained amateurs and could be used in bundles that are either crucial for the provision of individual ecosystem services or indicate agricultural landscapes with high value for red-listed species or crop yields. The use of bundles of characteristic indicator species for the simultaneous assessment of ecosystem services may reduce the amount of labour, time and cost in future assessments. In addition, future analysis using our framework in other ecosystems or with other subsets of ecosystem services and taxonomic groups will improve our understanding of service-providing species in local communities. In any case, expert knowledge is needed to select species from the identified subsets of significant indicator species and these species should be validated by existing data or additional sampling prior to being used for ecosystem service monitoring.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
, et al. (More)
(Less)
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Agricultural intensification, Biodiversity, Ecosystem service assessment, Indicator analysis, Multifunctionality, Synergies, Trade-offs
in
Ecological Indicators
volume
91
pages
9 pages
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:85045284660
ISSN
1470-160X
DOI
10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.018
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
c112d365-a4f0-42ac-a938-5b4910e95d18
date added to LUP
2018-04-23 12:47:40
date last changed
2019-04-23 04:31:44
@article{c112d365-a4f0-42ac-a938-5b4910e95d18,
  abstract     = {<p>Improving our understanding of the relationships between biodiversity and the delivery of ecosystem services is crucial for the development of sustainable agriculture. We introduce a novel framework that is based on the identification of indicator species for single or multiple ecosystem services across taxonomic groups based on indicator species analyses. We utilize multi-species community data (unlike previous single species approaches) without giving up information about the identity of species in our framework (unlike previous species richness approaches). We compiled a comprehensive community dataset including abundances of 683 invertebrate, vertebrate and plant species to identify indicator species that were either positively or negatively related to biological control, diversity of red-listed species or crop yield in agricultural landscapes in southern Sweden. Our results demonstrate that some taxonomic groups include significantly higher percentages of indicator species for these ecosystem services. Spider communities for example included a higher percentage of significant positive indicator species for biological control than ground or rove beetle communities. Bundles of indicator species for the analysed ecosystem service potentials usually included species that could be linked to the respective ecosystem service based on their functional role in local communities. Several of these species are conspicuous enough to be monitored by trained amateurs and could be used in bundles that are either crucial for the provision of individual ecosystem services or indicate agricultural landscapes with high value for red-listed species or crop yields. The use of bundles of characteristic indicator species for the simultaneous assessment of ecosystem services may reduce the amount of labour, time and cost in future assessments. In addition, future analysis using our framework in other ecosystems or with other subsets of ecosystem services and taxonomic groups will improve our understanding of service-providing species in local communities. In any case, expert knowledge is needed to select species from the identified subsets of significant indicator species and these species should be validated by existing data or additional sampling prior to being used for ecosystem service monitoring.</p>},
  author       = {Birkhofer, Klaus and Rusch, Adrien and Andersson, Georg K.S. and Bommarco, Riccardo and Dänhardt, Juliana and Ekbom, Barbara and Jönsson, Annelie and Lindborg, Regina and Olsson, Ola and Rader, Romina and Stjernman, Martin and Williams, Alwyn and Hedlund, Katarina and Smith, Henrik G.},
  issn         = {1470-160X},
  keyword      = {Agricultural intensification,Biodiversity,Ecosystem service assessment,Indicator analysis,Multifunctionality,Synergies,Trade-offs},
  language     = {eng},
  month        = {08},
  pages        = {278--286},
  publisher    = {Elsevier},
  series       = {Ecological Indicators},
  title        = {A framework to identify indicator species for ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.018},
  volume       = {91},
  year         = {2018},
}