Pia Sundgren
81 – 90 of 233
- show: 10
- |
- sort: year (new to old)
Close
Embed this list
<iframe src=" "
width=" "
height=" "
allowtransparency="true"
frameborder="0">
</iframe>
- 2017
-
Mark
Is accepting circular reasoning in shaken baby studies bad science or misconduct?
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
What are acceptable conclusions? Response to Dr. Ludvigsson
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
The shaken baby syndrome report was not the result of a conspiracy. Response to Dr. Narang et al.
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI at 7 T:Tail-Scaling Analysis and Inferences About Field Strength Dependence
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Conflicts of interest issues. Response to Lucas et al.
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
A misunderstanding. Response to Dr Bilo et al.
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
Differentiation of Brain Metastases due to Primary Malignancy and Glioblastomas using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced MR at 3T
2017) 40th ESNR Annual Meeting(
- Contribution to conference › Abstract
-
Mark
Shaken baby syndrome and the risk of losing scientific scrutiny
(
- Contribution to journal › Article
-
Mark
Authors' overarching reply to all the responses received to the systematic literature review on shaken baby syndrome
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
-
Mark
The scientific evidence regarding retinal haemorrhages. Response to Hellgren et al. and Levin
(
- Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial