Resonance in dialogue : The interplay between intersubjective motivations and cognitive facilitation
Pöldvere, Nele LU ; Johansson, Victoria LU and Paradis, Carita LU
(2021)
In Language and Cognition
13(4).
p.643-669
- Abstract
- Dialogic resonance, when speakers reproduce constructions from prior turns, is a compelling type of coordination in everyday conversation. This study takes its starting point in resonance in stance-taking sequences with the aim to account for the interplay between intersubjective motivations and cognitive facilitation in resonance production. It analyzes stance-taking sequences in the London–Lund Corpus 2, determining (i) the type of stance alignment (agreement or disagreement), and (ii) the time lapse between the stance-taking turns. The main findings are, firstly, that resonance is more likely than non-resonance to be used by speakers who express disagreement than agreement, which we interpret as a mitigating function of resonance, and,... (More)
- Dialogic resonance, when speakers reproduce constructions from prior turns, is a compelling type of coordination in everyday conversation. This study takes its starting point in resonance in stance-taking sequences with the aim to account for the interplay between intersubjective motivations and cognitive facilitation in resonance production. It analyzes stance-taking sequences in the London–Lund Corpus 2, determining (i) the type of stance alignment (agreement or disagreement), and (ii) the time lapse between the stance-taking turns. The main findings are, firstly, that resonance is more likely than non-resonance to be used by speakers who express disagreement than agreement, which we interpret as a mitigating function of resonance, and, secondly, that the turn transitions are faster in resonating sequences due to cognitive activation in the prior turn. We propose that the face-saving intersubjective motivation of resonance combines with its facilitating cognitive effect to promote appeasing communication. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/24c96748-60fe-47f3-9ccc-0c057c16f522
- author
- Pöldvere, Nele
LU
; Johansson, Victoria
LU
and Paradis, Carita
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2021
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Stance-taking, Disagreement, Intersubjective alignment, Cognitive activation, Turn transitions, London–Lund Corpus 2
- in
- Language and Cognition
- volume
- 13
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 643 - 669
- publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85112643981
- scopus:85112643981
- ISSN
- 1866-9859
- DOI
- 10.1017/langcog.2021.16
- project
- The London-Lund Corpus 2 of spoken British English (LLC 2)
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 24c96748-60fe-47f3-9ccc-0c057c16f522
- date added to LUP
- 2021-07-21 18:50:27
- date last changed
- 2023-11-23 05:13:55
@article{24c96748-60fe-47f3-9ccc-0c057c16f522,
abstract = {{Dialogic resonance, when speakers reproduce constructions from prior turns, is a compelling type of coordination in everyday conversation. This study takes its starting point in resonance in stance-taking sequences with the aim to account for the interplay between intersubjective motivations and cognitive facilitation in resonance production. It analyzes stance-taking sequences in the London–Lund Corpus 2, determining (i) the type of stance alignment (agreement or disagreement), and (ii) the time lapse between the stance-taking turns. The main findings are, firstly, that resonance is more likely than non-resonance to be used by speakers who express disagreement than agreement, which we interpret as a mitigating function of resonance, and, secondly, that the turn transitions are faster in resonating sequences due to cognitive activation in the prior turn. We propose that the face-saving intersubjective motivation of resonance combines with its facilitating cognitive effect to promote appeasing communication.}},
author = {{Pöldvere, Nele and Johansson, Victoria and Paradis, Carita}},
issn = {{1866-9859}},
keywords = {{Stance-taking; Disagreement; Intersubjective alignment; Cognitive activation; Turn transitions; London–Lund Corpus 2}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{4}},
pages = {{643--669}},
publisher = {{Cambridge University Press}},
series = {{Language and Cognition}},
title = {{Resonance in dialogue : The interplay between intersubjective motivations and cognitive facilitation}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2021.16}},
doi = {{10.1017/langcog.2021.16}},
volume = {{13}},
year = {{2021}},
}